2009
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/11/093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What can break the Wandzura-Wilczek relation?

Abstract: We analyze the breaking of the Wandzura-Wilczek relation for the g2 structure function, emphasizing its connection with transverse momentum dependent parton distribution functions. We find that the relation is broken by two distinct twist-3 terms, and clarify how these can be separated in measurements of double-spin asymmetries in semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering. Through a quantitative analysis of available g2 data we also show that the breaking of the Wandzura-Wilczek relation can be as large as 15-4… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
116
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
13
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For g T we resort to the frequently used Wandzura-Wilczek approximation [71] (see [72] for a recent study of the quality of this approximation)…”
Section: Numerical Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For g T we resort to the frequently used Wandzura-Wilczek approximation [71] (see [72] for a recent study of the quality of this approximation)…”
Section: Numerical Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well-known, the g 2 structure function receives a major contribution from the leading twist part of the g 1 structure function, which is typi-cally referred to as the Wandzura-Wilczek contribution [51]. Interestingly, deviations of the Wandzura-Wilczek approximation from experimental data can be explained by the aforementioned quark-gluon-quark correlations [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may insert the expressions (53) and (52) into (71) in order to write the observable in terms of three-parton correlation functions,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relation remains valid when target mass corrections are included in the twist-2 contribution [23,24].…”
Section: A Leading Twistmentioning
confidence: 81%