2009
DOI: 10.1080/17450910902764264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“What bloody man is that?”: Questioning biblical typology inMacbeth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 15 For an assessment of typology’s importance to early modern exegesis and thought, see Luxon; Freinkel; Streete, 2009 and 2012; Killeen, 2010 and 2011. While typology remained the dominant way of reading the Bible in the early decades of the seventeenth century, it is worth mentioning that alternative approaches to biblical interpretation were emerging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 For an assessment of typology’s importance to early modern exegesis and thought, see Luxon; Freinkel; Streete, 2009 and 2012; Killeen, 2010 and 2011. While typology remained the dominant way of reading the Bible in the early decades of the seventeenth century, it is worth mentioning that alternative approaches to biblical interpretation were emerging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%