1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00226366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What auroral electron and ion beams tell us about magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the observed distribution in Figure 5, only the cross section shows a positive slope while the integrated distribution shows a plateau. This is not surprising since secondary peaks in the integrated distribution are usually not observed [Kaufmann, 1984]. Diffusion induced by waves may rapidly scatter electrons in velocity space, and we interpret the plateau in the integrated distribution as a remainder of an anisotropy that could cause wave emissions.…”
Section: Ell(vii ) = • F(v)v ñ DV ñ (1)mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the observed distribution in Figure 5, only the cross section shows a positive slope while the integrated distribution shows a plateau. This is not surprising since secondary peaks in the integrated distribution are usually not observed [Kaufmann, 1984]. Diffusion induced by waves may rapidly scatter electrons in velocity space, and we interpret the plateau in the integrated distribution as a remainder of an anisotropy that could cause wave emissions.…”
Section: Ell(vii ) = • F(v)v ñ DV ñ (1)mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, Figures 4a and 4b show that at nonzero perpendicular velocities the secondary peak cannot be well described by a simple drifting Maxwellian. Rather, the relevant criterion for growth of electrostatic low-frequency waves is that there should be a secondary peak in the integrated one-dimensional distribution [e.g., Kaufmann, 1984].…”
Section: Specific Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upflowing ions that originated in the dense atmosphere will be expected to appear in region 3, their restricted pitch angle range produced by the mirror effect although transverse acceleration may move them into region 2b, producing conics [Ungstrup et al, 1979;Klumpar, 1979], or an electrostatic potential may give them additional parallel energy, further restricting their pitch angles and producing beams. However, ion beams often have pitch angle widths considerably wider than the loss cone [Coilin et al, 1981], possibly because of additional perpendicular heating [Singh et al, 1983] or diffusion [Kaufmann, 1984]. Alternatively, a structured electrostatic potential may itself give rise to conics [Lennartsson, 1980;Borovsky, 1983].…”
Section: B-• (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, accurate correction to the approximate pitch angle values in individual data samples is straightforward given an approximate knowledge of Z. where j(rn, E, ]•) is the ion intensity, ]• < 90 ø in the downward hemisphere and fire < 90ø (northern hemispheric notation); fire is energy dependent if A V :• 0. It is not possible to equate the upward flux in the (upward) loss cone with the net terrestrial ion flux, since ion beams may undergo pitch angle diffusion [Kaufman, 1984]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%