1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01546440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What atomic model should be used in internal conversion calculations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the latter set, eHF, the bound-electron wavefunctions of the HF model (described in [15] but with the magnetic interaction terms omitted) had been computed first by the program [16] and then applied to evaluate the ICC. The comparison of the two sets, c~Hv and ~Hvs, revealed the same general tendencies as observed [17] for transitions of higher energies.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the latter set, eHF, the bound-electron wavefunctions of the HF model (described in [15] but with the magnetic interaction terms omitted) had been computed first by the program [16] and then applied to evaluate the ICC. The comparison of the two sets, c~Hv and ~Hvs, revealed the same general tendencies as observed [17] for transitions of higher energies.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The X z values do not allow us to decide which of the two theories, HF or HFS, describes the experimental data better. Nevertheless, from the viewpoint of [17] we prefer the former value as a more realistic one.…”
Section: Inner Shellsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The calculations are based on the relativistic one-electron wave functions. To get the theoretical ICC for the investigated transition in tellurium we utilized the same method as in [14]. The results are in Table 2.…”
Section: Calculations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%