What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax

Abstract

a b s t r a c tIn this paper we examine the neurobiological correlates of syntax, the processing of structured sequences, by comparing FMRI results on artificial and natural language syntax. We discuss these and similar findings in the context of formal language and computability theory. We used a simple right-linear unification grammar in an implicit artificial grammar learning paradigm in 32 healthy Dutch university students (natural language FMRI data were already acquired for these participants). We predicted that artificial syntax processing would engage the left inferior frontal region (BA 44/45) and that this activation would overlap with syntax-related variability observed in the natural language experiment. The main findings of this study show that the left inferior frontal region centered on BA 44/45 is active during artificial syntax processing of well-formed (grammatical) sequence independent of local subsequence familiarity. The same region is engaged to a greater extent when a syntactic violation is present and structural unification becomes difficult or impossible. The effects related to artificial syntax in the left inferior frontal region (BA 44/45) were essentially identical when we masked these with activity related to natural syntax in the same subjects. Finally, the medial temporal lobe was deactivated during this operation, consistent with the view that implicit processing does not rely on declarative memory mechanisms that engage the medial temporal lobe. In the context of recent FMRI findings, we raise the question whether Broca's region (or subregions) is specifically related to syntactic movement operations or the processing of hierarchically nested non-adjacent dependencies in the discussion section. We conclude that this is not the case. Instead, we argue that the left inferior frontal region is a generic on-line sequence processor that unifies information from various sources in an incremental and recursive manner, independent of whether there are any processing requirements related to syntactic movement or hierarchically nested structures. In addition, we argue that the Chomsky hierarchy is not directly relevant for neurobiological systems.

Slip of the tongue: Implications for evolution and language development

“…Broca's region in humans and the analogous neural region in the monkey brain (F5) may act as a supramodal processor for planned, structured action sequences represented by both the hands and the mouth (e.g. Petersson, Folia, & Hagoort, 2012;Pulvermüller & Fadiga, 2010). This sort of system supports perceptionaction coupling and may have acted as a catalyst for the emergence of syntactic processes found in modern human language (e.g.…”

Syntactic comprehension deficits across the FTD-ALS continuum

“…As expected, semantic deficits were correlated with atrophy of the anterior temporal lobes. Separately, the left frontal inferior lobe has been associated with the processing of syntax in normal subjects, 24 although parts of the temporal lobes may also be involved. 25 Whether involvement of these regions in ALS results in clinically detectable syntactic deficits remains unclear.…”

Physics instruction induces changes in neural knowledge representation during successive stages of learning

“…Typically, these tasks examine brain changes in activation, in which it may be difficult to separate new representations from learned processes. Examples of tasks that examine activation in training-based learning include artificial grammars (Petersson, Folia, & Hagoort, 2012), perceptual category learning (Poldrack et al, 2001), and motor learning (Toni, Krams, Turner, & Passingham, 1998). Instruction-based learning tasks such as algebra (Anderson et al, 2012 have also resulted in activation changes.…”