2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10857-014-9274-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are they asking? An analysis of the questions planned by prospective teachers when integrating literature in mathematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many teacher educators teach pre-service teachers how to create a product -a lesson plan comprised of required individual components, such as objectives, materials list, procedures, strategies, assessments, and closures (Drost & Levine, 2015). Despite the explicit teaching of individual lesson plan components, many pre-service teachers struggle with writing and assessing objectives (Jones, et al, 2011;Eun Kyung, 2012), as well as planning effective questions, (Purdum-Cassidy, Nesmith, Meyer & Cooper, 2015), student engagement (Jones, et al, 2011), and instructional strategies (Ruys, Keer, & Aelterman, 2012). Furthermore, pre-service teachers' response to this product-based approach may be primarily one of complying with technical expectations of the required lesson plan components rather than engaging in the complex cognitive processes involved in lesson planning (Tummons, 2010).…”
Section: Pre-service Teachers and Lesson Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many teacher educators teach pre-service teachers how to create a product -a lesson plan comprised of required individual components, such as objectives, materials list, procedures, strategies, assessments, and closures (Drost & Levine, 2015). Despite the explicit teaching of individual lesson plan components, many pre-service teachers struggle with writing and assessing objectives (Jones, et al, 2011;Eun Kyung, 2012), as well as planning effective questions, (Purdum-Cassidy, Nesmith, Meyer & Cooper, 2015), student engagement (Jones, et al, 2011), and instructional strategies (Ruys, Keer, & Aelterman, 2012). Furthermore, pre-service teachers' response to this product-based approach may be primarily one of complying with technical expectations of the required lesson plan components rather than engaging in the complex cognitive processes involved in lesson planning (Tummons, 2010).…”
Section: Pre-service Teachers and Lesson Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many teacher educators teach pre-service teachers how to create a product -a lesson plan comprised of required individual components, such as objectives, materials list, procedures, strategies, assessments, and closures (Drost & Levine, 2015). Despite the explicit teaching of individual lesson plan components, many pre-service teachers struggle with writing and assessing objectives (Jones, et al, 2011;Eun Kyung, 2012), as well as planning effective questions, (Purdum-Cassidy, Nesmith, Meyer & Cooper, 2015), student engagement (Jones, et al, 2011), and instructional strategies (Ruys, Keer, & Aelterman, 2012). Furthermore, pre-service teachers' response to this product-based approach may be primarily one of complying with technical expectations of the required lesson plan components rather than engaging in the complex cognitive processes involved in lesson planning (Tummons, 2010).…”
Section: Pre-service Teachers and Lesson Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, a practical implication is for teacher educators to use children's literature as a vehicle to engage preservice and in-service teachers alike in the mathematics teaching and learning dynamic. As the research suggests, exposing them to literature alone in teacher education programs or professional development sessions is not sufficient-teachers must extend the work embedded within literature texts to author mathematics tasks and learning activities, create reform-oriented questions (Purdum-Cassidy et al, 2015), infuse advocacy letter writing in concert with the text's learning goals (Massengale, Childers-McKee, & Benavides, 2014), and develop mathematics writing prompts responsive to the needs of their students. With this case study, children's literature prompted the early childhood education majors to be creative and innovative in their mathematics lesson designs, so teacher educators should capitalize off of literature's creative schemas to extend this work in unique ways.…”
Section: Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, preservice elementary teachers generally have an affinity toward children's literature (Purdum-Cassidy et al, 2015). In line with this, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) encourages the use of literature in mathematics as a medium to address mathematics standards in an ingenious fashion (NCTM, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%