2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the social benefits of homeownership? Experimental evidence for low-income households

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(47 reference statements)
3
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result is obtained for neighbourhood satisfaction. The question of which ownership levels are 'right' is not the focus of our paper, but our results are supportive of the hypotheses inEngelhardt et al (2010) andHaurin et al (2003) that incremental changes in external effects of homeownership are largest when current homeownership rates are low, thus indicating a non-linear relation…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…A similar result is obtained for neighbourhood satisfaction. The question of which ownership levels are 'right' is not the focus of our paper, but our results are supportive of the hypotheses inEngelhardt et al (2010) andHaurin et al (2003) that incremental changes in external effects of homeownership are largest when current homeownership rates are low, thus indicating a non-linear relation…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…General political involvement and voting were found to be unrelated to homeownership in a field experiment (Engelhardt, Eriksen, Gale, & Mills, 2010). Therefore, we assess voting in local rather than national elections.…”
Section: Civic Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches never fully overcome the selection problem associated with nonexperimental data. Alternatively, a field experiment can provide a truly exogenous instrument, as demonstrated in the recent work by Engelhardt et al (2010). In our application, we use a large and representative random sample, containing information on personal traits that are not normally observed, to control for selection effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%