What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes?

Abstract

What factor(s) influence the likelihood a student will succeed in college biology? Some researchers have found the primary determinant to be the student's prior knowledge of biology, while others have found it to be reasoning ability. Perhaps the ability of these factors to predict achievement depends on the instructional method employed. Expository instruction focuses primarily on facts and concepts. Therefore, perhaps the best predictor of achievement in expository classes is domain-specific prior knowledge. Inquiry instruction focuses more on how science is done, i.e., on scientific processes; therefore, perhaps the best predictor in inquiry classes is reasoning ability. This study was designed to test these hypotheses. Students enrolled in a nonmajors community college biology course were pretested to determine reasoning ability and prior knowledge. The number of previous biology courses was also recorded as an indicator of prior knowledge. After a semester of either expository or inquiry (learning-cycle) instruction, students took a comprehensive final examination. Reasoning ability but not prior knowledge or number of previous biology courses accounted for a significant amount of variance in final examination score in both instructional methods and with semester examination and quiz scores in inquiry classes. This suggests that reasoning ability limits achievement more than prior knowledge among these biology students, whether they are enrolled in expository or inquiry classes. Reasoning ability explained more of the variance in final examination scores for students enrolled in expository classes (18.8%) than in inquiry classes (7.2%). The reason for this is not clear, but significant improvements in reasoning were found in the inquiry but not in the expository classes. These improvements were accompanied by significant differences in achievement in the inquiry classes. Perhaps the reasoning improvement facilitated the better and more equal achievement for students in the inquiry classes, thus reducing the correlation between initial reasoning ability and final achievement.

The Effect of Three Cognitive Variables on Students’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter and its Changes of State

“…Noticeably, it was the only significant predictor of 'particulate dimension' and 'interpretations' (Table 3). These results are consistent with other findings in previous studies that reported the supremacy of logical thinking as a predictor variable on science achievement (Chandran et al 1987;Lawson & Thomson 1988;Johnson & Lawson 1998;Kang et al, 2005;). Lawson (1985) concluded that "deficiencies in formal reasoning are a probable cause of achievement deficiencies in the sciences, mathematics etc".…”

Enhancing Ninth Grade Students' Understanding Of Human Circulatory System Concepts Through Conceptual Change Approach

“…In fact, it was found that both covariates had significant effects on understanding of human circulatory system concepts. This result are consistent with previous researchers finding in which reasoning ability and prior knowledge have great influence on students' understanding of science concepts (BouJaude et al, 2004;Doru-Atay & Tekkaya, 2008;Kang et al, 2004;Johnson & Lawson, 1998). For example, BouJaude et al (2004) reported that formal operational reasoning was the main predictor of performance on conceptual chemistry problems, accounting 18% of the variance.…”

Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles

“…Prior knowledge is an important determinant of learning (Johnson & Lawson, 1998) and has been studied extensively in science education. From misconception research, there is widespread agreement that learners construct concepts from prior knowledge (Novak, 1990).…”