What are the politics of love?

Mitchell, Roger

doi:10.1080/23269995.2018.1512034

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Through the work there were moments of ‘transcendent unity’, 50 moving beyond difficulties to create new strength and stability. These insights link with bell hooks' 52 conceptualisation of love as bringing people together in solidarity, overcoming previous problems 53 . This power through love is not based on personal will, autonomy or sovereignty but on ‘the desire of well‐being of another’, ‘a way of doing things individually or collaboratively for the wellbeing of others’, 53 love as ‘connected to the specific values of justice, honesty and generosity’ 53 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…These insights link with bell hooks' 52 conceptualisation of love as bringing people together in solidarity, overcoming previous problems. 53 This power through love is not based on personal will, autonomy or sovereignty but on 'the desire of well-being of another', 'a way of doing things individually or collaboratively for the wellbeing of others', 53 love as 'connected to the specific values of justice, honesty and generosity'. 53 With this in mind, we share one of the women's artwork with words of her experiences of Bridging Gaps: Trauma-informed principles and experiences/lessons learnt Recommendations…”

Section: Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Trauma‐informed co‐production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs

McGeown

Potter

Stone

et al. 2023

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionHealth, social care, charitable and justice sectors are increasingly recognising the need for trauma‐informed services that seek to recognise signs of trauma, provide appropriate paths to recovery and ensure that services enable people rather than retraumatise. Foundational to the development of trauma‐informed services is collaboration with people with lived experience of trauma. Co‐production principles may provide a useful framework for this collaboration, due to their emphasis on lived experience, and intent to address power imbalances and promote equity. This article aims to examine trauma‐informed and co‐production principles to consider the extent to which they overlap and explore how to tailor co‐production approaches to support people who have experienced trauma.MethodsBridging Gaps is a collaboration between women who have experienced complex trauma, a charity that supports them, primary care clinicians and health researchers to improve access to trauma‐informed primary care. Using co‐production principles, we aimed to ensure that women who have experienced trauma were key decision‐makers throughout the project. Through reflective notes (n = 19), observations of meetings (n = 3), interviews with people involved in the project (n = 9) and reflective group discussions on our experiences, we share learning, successes and failures. Data analysis followed a framework approach, using trauma‐informed principles.ResultsCo‐production processes can require adaptation when working with people who have experienced trauma. We emphasise the need for close partnership working, flexibility and transparency around power dynamics, paying particular attention to aspects of power that are less readily visible. Sharing experiences can retrigger trauma. People conducting co‐production work need to understand trauma and how this may impact upon an individual's sense of psychological safety. Long‐term funding is vital to enable projects to have enough time for the establishment of trust and delivery of tangible results.ConclusionsCo‐production principles are highly suitable when developing trauma‐informed services. Greater consideration needs to be given as to whether and how people share lived experiences, the need for safe spaces, honesty and humility, difficult dynamics between empowerment and safety and whether and when blurring boundaries may be helpful. Our findings have applicability to policy‐making, funding and service provision to enable co‐production processes to become more trauma‐informed.Public ContributionBridging Gaps was started by a group of women who have experienced complex trauma, including addiction, homelessness, mental health problems, sexual exploitation, domestic and sexual violence and poverty, with a general practitioner (GP) who provides healthcare to this population, alongside a support worker from the charity One25, a charity that supports some of the most marginalised women in Bristol to heal and thrive. More GPs and healthcare researchers joined the group and they have been meeting fortnightly for a period of 4 years with the aim of improving access to trauma‐informed primary care. The group uses co‐production principles to work together, and we aim to ensure that women who have experienced trauma are key decision‐makers throughout our work together. This article is a summary of our learning, informed by discussion, observations and interviews with members of the group.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Section: Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trauma‐informed co‐production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs

McGeown

Potter

Stone

et al. 2023

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Through the work there were moments of "transcendent unity" 49 , moving beyond difficulties to create new strength and stability. These insights link with bell hooks 51 conceptualisation of love, as bringing people together in solidarity, overcoming previous problems 52 . This power through love is not based on personal will, autonomy or sovereignty but on "the desire of well-being of another", "a way of doing things individually or collaboratively for the wellbeing of others" 52 , love as "connected to the specific values of justice, honesty and generosity" 52 .…”

Section: Empowerment and Choicementioning

confidence: 83%

“…These insights link with bell hooks 51 conceptualisation of love, as bringing people together in solidarity, overcoming previous problems 52 . This power through love is not based on personal will, autonomy or sovereignty but on "the desire of well-being of another", "a way of doing things individually or collaboratively for the wellbeing of others" 52 , love as "connected to the specific values of justice, honesty and generosity" 52 . With this in mind, we share one of women's artwork with words of her experiences of Bridging Gaps:…”

Section: Empowerment and Choicementioning

confidence: 83%

Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs

McGeown

Potter

Stone

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Health, social care, charitable and justice sectors are increasingly recognising the need for trauma-informed services that seek to recognise signs of trauma, provide appropriate paths to recovery, and ensure that services enable people rather than re-traumatise. Foundational to the development of trauma-informed services is collaboration with people with lived experience of trauma. Co-production principles may provide a useful framework for this collaboration, due to their emphasis on lived experience, and intent to address power imbalances and promote equity. This article aims to examine trauma-informed and co-production principles to consider the extent to which they overlap and explore how to tailor co-production approaches to support people who have experienced trauma. Methods: Bridging Gaps is a collaboration between women who have experienced complex trauma, a charity that supports them, primary care clinicians and health researchers to improve access to trauma-informed primary care. Using co-production principles, we aimed to ensure that women who have experienced trauma were key decision-makers throughout the project. Through reflective notes (n=19), observations of meetings (n=3), interviews with people involved in the project (n=9) and reflective group discussions on our experiences, we share learning, successes and failures. Data analysis followed a framework approach, using trauma-informed principles. Results: Co-production processes can require adaptation when working with people who have experienced trauma. We emphasise the need for close partnership working, flexibility, and transparency around power dynamics, paying particular attention to aspects of power that are less readily visible. Sharing experiences can re-trigger trauma. People conducting co-production work need to understand trauma and how this may impact upon an individual's sense of psychological safety. Long-term funding is vital to enable projects to have enough time for establishment of trust and delivery of tangible results. Conclusions: Co-production principles are highly suitable when developing trauma-informed services. Greater consideration needs to be given as to whether and how people share lived experiences, the need for safe spaces, honesty and humility, difficult dynamics between empowerment and safety, and whether and when blurring boundaries may be helpful. Our findings have applicability to policy-making, funding and service provision to enable co-production processes to become more trauma-informed.

show abstract

Cultivating new post-secular political space

Mitchell¹

2018

Global Discourse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emergence of post-secular new political space is increasingly recognised as both urgent challenge and beckoning opportunity for innovative political intervention. The concept is framed around three defining characteristics. Firstly, it refers to socio-economic space vacated by government and demarcated by extremes of poverty and marginalisation requiring mitigation by charities, faith communities and the like. Secondly, it is evidenced in local contexts by an obvious lack of social mobility and blatant discrepancies in income, educational outcomes and life expectancy. Thirdly, it is ontological space. Arguably for the first time in a generation, the deep political structures are accessible to recognition and transformation. Fourthly, it is European space exemplified by the increasing challenge to the post-war European project and the burgeoning nationalism and xenophobia exacerbated at least in part by the influx of refugees, asylum seekers and economic migrants. This special issue of Global Discourse assembles six articles and responses emanating from a desire to cultivate and not colonise this emerging space for overall well-being.

show abstract

What are the politics of love?

Cited by 4 publications

References 7 publications

Trauma‐informed co‐production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs

Trauma‐informed co‐production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs

Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs

Cultivating new post-secular political space

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About