What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews

Abstract

Study objective: To review systematic review literature that describes the effectiveness of transport interventions in improving population health. Methods: Systematic review methodology was used to evaluate published and unpublished systematic reviews in any language that described the measured health effects of any mode of transport intervention. Main results: 28 systematic reviews were identified. The highest quality reviews indicate that the most effective transport interventions to improve health are health promotion campaigns (to prevent childhood injuries, to increase bicycle and motorcycle helmet use, and to promote children's car seat and seatbelt use), traffic calming, and specific legislation against drink driving. Driver improvement and education courses are associated with increases in crash involvement and violations. Conclusions: Systematic reviews are able to provide evidence about effective ways of improving health through transport related interventions and also identify well intentioned but harmful interventions. Valuable additional information may exist in primary studies and systematic reviews have a role in evaluating and synthesising their findings.

Speeding drivers’ attitudes and perceptions of speed cameras in rural England

“…It found that for every 1 mile per hour (mph) reduction in average speed, collisions are reduced by between 2% and 7%. However, it is insufficient to attempt to achieve reductions in collisions by simply lowering the statutory speed limit because drivers tend to respond poorly to such interventions (Morrison et al, 2003). Nevertheless, it is possible to enforce existing speed limits better by using interventions such as speed cameras.…”

Working for health? Evidence from systematic reviews on the effects on health and health inequalities of organisational changes to the psychosocial work environment

“…It is therefore under-used in public health policy. Umbrella reviews are an increasingly common way of identifying, appraising, and synthesising such systematic reviews (Bialy et al, 2006;Egan et al, 2008;Main et al, 2008;Morrison et al, 2003) and making them suitable for a new audience -in this case public health researchers, practitioners and policy makers (Wanless, 2004). In addition, umbrella reviews are able to present the overarching findings of such systematic reviews (Higgins & Green, 2008).…”

Beta blockers exposure and traumatic brain injury: a literature review

“…Implementation of a selective traffic enforcement programme had produced 90% compliance by 1993 (234,235). Another effective approach involves incentives, in which people found wearing seat-belts are eligible for prizes in much the same way they might be in a lottery (233,236).…”