Connectionist Models of Neurocognition and Emergent Behavior 2011
DOI: 10.1142/9789814340359_0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Are the Functional Units in Reading? Evidence for Statistical Variation Influencing Word Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Granularity and consistency are important aspects of this structure, and both impact reading performance. Adult readers are slower to identify letters within a multi-letter grapheme (Smith and Monaghan, 2011;Rey et al, 2000), suggesting that graphemes are functional reading units. Furthermore, Rastle and Coltheart (1998) found that naming latencies were slower for pseudo-words with, as compared to without, multi-letter graphemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Granularity and consistency are important aspects of this structure, and both impact reading performance. Adult readers are slower to identify letters within a multi-letter grapheme (Smith and Monaghan, 2011;Rey et al, 2000), suggesting that graphemes are functional reading units. Furthermore, Rastle and Coltheart (1998) found that naming latencies were slower for pseudo-words with, as compared to without, multi-letter graphemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%