“…Even looking at the frequency of other categories for variables residence, we found that there is a clear positive effect of residence on the park's popularity; parks were marked most as favourite places by those students who lived in the ward studied (39.6%), followed by those who came from another ward (30.2%), and least by those who did not come from the town (24.5%). This is in line with the findings showing proximity to be an important predictor of park popularity (Lee et al 2021) with long distances to urban green areas having a limiting effect on their use (Shan 2014 andTu et al 2020). In relation to this, literature has shown that people prefer to visit parks in their neighbourhoods (Kemperman and Timmermans 2006b) and thus most of the park visitors are locals (Paul andNagendra 2017 andMak andJim 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast to these fin-dings, Shan (2014) revealed no associations between age and frequency of visits. Shan (2014), Tu et al (2020) and Lee et al (2021), agreed that park proximity is an important predictor of park visits while long distances to urban green areas have a limiting effect on their use. In relation to this, a prevailing body of literature has shown that people prefer to visit parks in their neighbourhood (Kemperman and Timmermans 2006b) and thus most park visitors are locals (Paul andNagendra 2017 andMak andJim 2019).…”
Urban parks as adolescentsʼ favourite places? Analysis of preferences with respect to environmentally responsible behaviourResearch on adolescentsʼ favourite places has received limited attention and only a small number of studies have focused on the preference for greenery among all urban areas, or considered a nature orientation of individuals in this regard. The aim of this paper is to present an analysis of adolescentsʼ 'favourite place' selection in relation to their environmentally responsible behaviour (ERB), gender, and residential location. A total of 272 participants (13 -16 years of age) completed mapping activities, during which data on favourite places, as well as ERBs were collected. The research was located in the oldest ward of Banská Bystrica (central Slovakia). The measurement of ERB was based on Ajzenʼs theory of planned behaviour. The results showed that ERB has no effect on the choice of parks as favourite places in the town. It means that individuals with higher ERB scores mark parks as their favourite places to a similar extent compared to other urban areas. Yet, the parks themselves were more popular among adolescents with a higher ERB score. Residents of the studied ward had a greater preference for parks than other public space users. The same was observed for girls compared to boys. A closer look at adolescentsʼ behavioural aspects of favourite place selection and motives for labelling green sites requires more in-depth future research.
“…Even looking at the frequency of other categories for variables residence, we found that there is a clear positive effect of residence on the park's popularity; parks were marked most as favourite places by those students who lived in the ward studied (39.6%), followed by those who came from another ward (30.2%), and least by those who did not come from the town (24.5%). This is in line with the findings showing proximity to be an important predictor of park popularity (Lee et al 2021) with long distances to urban green areas having a limiting effect on their use (Shan 2014 andTu et al 2020). In relation to this, literature has shown that people prefer to visit parks in their neighbourhoods (Kemperman and Timmermans 2006b) and thus most of the park visitors are locals (Paul andNagendra 2017 andMak andJim 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast to these fin-dings, Shan (2014) revealed no associations between age and frequency of visits. Shan (2014), Tu et al (2020) and Lee et al (2021), agreed that park proximity is an important predictor of park visits while long distances to urban green areas have a limiting effect on their use. In relation to this, a prevailing body of literature has shown that people prefer to visit parks in their neighbourhood (Kemperman and Timmermans 2006b) and thus most park visitors are locals (Paul andNagendra 2017 andMak andJim 2019).…”
Urban parks as adolescentsʼ favourite places? Analysis of preferences with respect to environmentally responsible behaviourResearch on adolescentsʼ favourite places has received limited attention and only a small number of studies have focused on the preference for greenery among all urban areas, or considered a nature orientation of individuals in this regard. The aim of this paper is to present an analysis of adolescentsʼ 'favourite place' selection in relation to their environmentally responsible behaviour (ERB), gender, and residential location. A total of 272 participants (13 -16 years of age) completed mapping activities, during which data on favourite places, as well as ERBs were collected. The research was located in the oldest ward of Banská Bystrica (central Slovakia). The measurement of ERB was based on Ajzenʼs theory of planned behaviour. The results showed that ERB has no effect on the choice of parks as favourite places in the town. It means that individuals with higher ERB scores mark parks as their favourite places to a similar extent compared to other urban areas. Yet, the parks themselves were more popular among adolescents with a higher ERB score. Residents of the studied ward had a greater preference for parks than other public space users. The same was observed for girls compared to boys. A closer look at adolescentsʼ behavioural aspects of favourite place selection and motives for labelling green sites requires more in-depth future research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.