“…Empirically, the reliability of the Amihud (2002) illiquidity ratio has been verified in a series of horseraces using data from the U.S. (Goyenko et al, 2009), emerging markets (Lesmond, 2005), frontier markets (Marshall et al, 2013) and global stock exchanges (Fong et al, 2014b). In these four studies, the Amihud ratio is found to exhibit one of the highest correlations among cost-pervolume proxies with intraday benchmarks.…”
Section: Measuring Stock Liquiditymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Liquidity also influences the decision of capital structure (Lipson and Mortal, 2009), enhances market efficiency (Chordia et al, 2008), increases firm performance (Fang et al, 2009) and improves corporate governance (Edmans et al, 2013). 2 As a dependent variable, the literature explores the contributing factors of stock liquidity, which include corporate governance (Chung et al, 2010), financial transparency (Heflin et al, 2005), financial liberalization (Vagias and van Dijk, 2012), security analysts (Roulstone, 2003), local institutions (Agarwal, 2007), local blockholders (Brockman et al, 2009), local individual investors (Amihud et al, 1999) and foreign institutions (Rhee and Wang, 2009). prices (for the liquidity menu, see Goyenko et al, 2009;Fong et al, 2014b). This positive development has contributed to a gradual increase in the understudied emerging markets in recent decade.…”
Abstract:This paper examines the relationship between shareholdings of various investor groups and stock liquidity for Malaysian public listed firms over the [2002][2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009] sample period. Using the Amihud illiquidity ratio, we extend the literature by addressing the issues of investor heterogeneity, trading account types and the interactions of competing liquidity channels. The analysis reveals that only local institutions and local individual investors who trade through the direct accounts are significantly associated with the liquidity of domestic firms. In contrast, the significant liquidity effect for foreign investors operates through the nominee accounts. While institutional ownership exhibits a linear negative relationship, our findings on local individuals and foreign nominees differ greatly from previous studies in that their relationship with stock liquidity is non-monotonic. Apart from the widely researched information asymmetry and trading effects, we find that liquidity is also driven by the largely ignored information competition channel. An important insight from our findings is that the large shareholdings by any particular investor group is detrimental to stock liquidity as they exacerbate information asymmetry, reduce the degree of competition and lower the level of trading activity.JEL Classifications: G12; G32
“…Empirically, the reliability of the Amihud (2002) illiquidity ratio has been verified in a series of horseraces using data from the U.S. (Goyenko et al, 2009), emerging markets (Lesmond, 2005), frontier markets (Marshall et al, 2013) and global stock exchanges (Fong et al, 2014b). In these four studies, the Amihud ratio is found to exhibit one of the highest correlations among cost-pervolume proxies with intraday benchmarks.…”
Section: Measuring Stock Liquiditymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Liquidity also influences the decision of capital structure (Lipson and Mortal, 2009), enhances market efficiency (Chordia et al, 2008), increases firm performance (Fang et al, 2009) and improves corporate governance (Edmans et al, 2013). 2 As a dependent variable, the literature explores the contributing factors of stock liquidity, which include corporate governance (Chung et al, 2010), financial transparency (Heflin et al, 2005), financial liberalization (Vagias and van Dijk, 2012), security analysts (Roulstone, 2003), local institutions (Agarwal, 2007), local blockholders (Brockman et al, 2009), local individual investors (Amihud et al, 1999) and foreign institutions (Rhee and Wang, 2009). prices (for the liquidity menu, see Goyenko et al, 2009;Fong et al, 2014b). This positive development has contributed to a gradual increase in the understudied emerging markets in recent decade.…”
Abstract:This paper examines the relationship between shareholdings of various investor groups and stock liquidity for Malaysian public listed firms over the [2002][2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009] sample period. Using the Amihud illiquidity ratio, we extend the literature by addressing the issues of investor heterogeneity, trading account types and the interactions of competing liquidity channels. The analysis reveals that only local institutions and local individual investors who trade through the direct accounts are significantly associated with the liquidity of domestic firms. In contrast, the significant liquidity effect for foreign investors operates through the nominee accounts. While institutional ownership exhibits a linear negative relationship, our findings on local individuals and foreign nominees differ greatly from previous studies in that their relationship with stock liquidity is non-monotonic. Apart from the widely researched information asymmetry and trading effects, we find that liquidity is also driven by the largely ignored information competition channel. An important insight from our findings is that the large shareholdings by any particular investor group is detrimental to stock liquidity as they exacerbate information asymmetry, reduce the degree of competition and lower the level of trading activity.JEL Classifications: G12; G32
“…Given this, and the fact that "Zeros" is easier to implement, studies such as Bekaert et al (2007) just use Zeros rather than Zeros and LOT. Moreover, the FHT proxy we include is another simplification of the LOT model and Fong et al (2011) show that this is more accurate than LOT.…”
Section: Liquidity Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The monthly average quoted spread is, following Fong et al (2011), calculated by time weighting the intraday spreads. The five-minute price impact measure is calculated as per Eq.…”
Section: Transaction Cost Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt a similar approach to Goyenko et al (2009) and Fong et al (2011) and run "horse races" between popular liquidity proxies in frontier markets to determine which measures have the largest correlations and lowest root mean squared errors with high frequency liquidity benchmarks.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.