What Are Constructs? Ontological Nature, Epistemological Challenges, Theoretical Foundations and Key Sources of Misunderstandings and Confusions

Uher, Jana

doi:10.1080/1047840x.2023.2274384

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For us, metatheory deals with the investigation of scientific theories, as well as their relation to stances in theory of science. In our view, philosophy and the sciences can particularly benefit from the investigation of the logical connection between metatheory and methodology (see Hanfstingl, 2019 ; Uher, 2023 ). Validity, as one domain of disagreement, is commonly understood to address whether one measures what is intended to be measured.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Primacy of theory? Exploring perspectives on validity in conceptual psychometrics

Ramminger,

Jacobs

2024

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several conceptions of validity have emphasized the contingency of validity on theory. Here we revisit several contributions to the discourse on the concept of validity, which we consider particularly influential or insightful. Despite differences in metatheory, both Cronbach and Meehl’s construct validity, and Borsboom, Mellenbergh and van Heerden’s early concept of validity regard validity as a criterion for successful measurement and thus, as crucial for the soundness of psychological science. Others, such as Borgstede and Eggert, regard recourses to validity as an appeal to an (unscientific) folk psychology. Instead, they advocate theory-based measurement. It will be demonstrated that these divergent positions converge in their view of psychological theory as indispensable for the soundness of psychological measurement. However, the formulation of the concept (and scope) of scientific theory differs across the presented conceptions of validity. These differences can be at least partially attributed to three disparities in metatheoretical and methodological stances. The first concerns the question of the structure of scientific theories. The second concerns the question of psychology’s subject matter. The third regards whether, and if, to which extent, correlations can be indicative of causality and therefore point toward validity. These results indicate that metatheory may help to structure the discourse on the concept of validity by revealing the contingencies the concrete positions rely on.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%