2007
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.021394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What and who are clinical ethics committees for?

Abstract: As support for clinical ethics committees in the UK grows, care must be taken to define their function, membership and method of working and the status of their decisions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This concern has been expressed most forcefully in the US, with critics of CES fearing that a creeping quasi-legal status may become attached to the deliberations of committees and consultants (Pope, 2009), reflecting the possibility that, as McLean (2008) has observed, it is "all-too-easy move from advice to authority and from commentary to decision-making" (2008,101). Even if the consultant (or committee) issues nonbinding advice, this may still impact on subsequent actions (McLean, 2007). In cases where a consultation involves a dispute between the patient (and family) and the clinical team, there is a need to ensure some degree of procedural fairness; all parties in a dispute have the right to a fair hearing.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ces Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This concern has been expressed most forcefully in the US, with critics of CES fearing that a creeping quasi-legal status may become attached to the deliberations of committees and consultants (Pope, 2009), reflecting the possibility that, as McLean (2008) has observed, it is "all-too-easy move from advice to authority and from commentary to decision-making" (2008,101). Even if the consultant (or committee) issues nonbinding advice, this may still impact on subsequent actions (McLean, 2007). In cases where a consultation involves a dispute between the patient (and family) and the clinical team, there is a need to ensure some degree of procedural fairness; all parties in a dispute have the right to a fair hearing.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ces Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been contention in the literature as to whether patients should be involved in ethics case consultations and if so, to what degree. Some have claimed that where consultations have a direct bearing on care, the lodestars of clinical ethics support are potentially undermined, namely, patient autonomy and self-determination (Wolf, 1992), raising important questions about due process (McLean, 2007(McLean, , 2009). This concern has been expressed most forcefully in the US, with critics of CES fearing that a creeping quasi-legal status may become attached to the deliberations of committees and consultants (Pope, 2009), reflecting the possibility that, as McLean (2008) has observed, it is "all-too-easy move from advice to authority and from commentary to decision-making" (2008,101).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ces Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More research is required on the benefits and uses of CECs (RCP, 2005;McLean, 2007) and, specifically, on their use in infertility clinics. However, despite this need for continuing evaluation, the case for the utility of CECs is a strong one and more infertility units could benefit from their use.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legal status of their decisions and/or deliberations is sometimes ambiguous and needs to be clarified (RCP, 2005;McLean, 2007). However, the HFEA is clear that the responsibility for any decision is that of the 'PR' and therefore CECs only give guidance and advice, they do not have any legal standing as a decision-making body (HFEA, 2000).…”
Section: Legal Status Of Committees' Deliberationsmentioning
confidence: 98%