“…There has also been contention in the literature as to whether patients should be involved in ethics case consultations and if so, to what degree. Some have claimed that where consultations have a direct bearing on care, the lodestars of clinical ethics support are potentially undermined, namely, patient autonomy and self-determination (Wolf, 1992), raising important questions about due process (McLean, 2007(McLean, , 2009). This concern has been expressed most forcefully in the US, with critics of CES fearing that a creeping quasi-legal status may become attached to the deliberations of committees and consultants (Pope, 2009), reflecting the possibility that, as McLean (2008) has observed, it is "all-too-easy move from advice to authority and from commentary to decision-making" (2008,101).…”