2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10389-022-01813-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What affected UK adults’ adherence to medicines during the COVID-19 pandemic? Cross-sectional survey in a representative sample of people with long-term conditions

Abstract: Aim Medicines non-adherence is associated with poorer outcomes and higher costs. COVID-19 affected access to healthcare, with increased reliance on remote methods, including medicines supply. This study aimed to identify what affected people’s adherence to medicines for long-term conditions (LTCs) during the pandemic. Subject and methods Cross-sectional online survey of UK adults prescribed medicines for LTCs assessing self-reported medicines adherence, re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some relevant risk factors are included in the analysis, many of these factors are not taken into account. Patients who have a better prescription coverage have better organization and planning, 31 which may help adherence to social distancing, and isolation methods that may reduce risk of infection. Patients who adhere to their medication tend to be patients who suffer from more severe disease, 32 and may be more likely to self-isolate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some relevant risk factors are included in the analysis, many of these factors are not taken into account. Patients who have a better prescription coverage have better organization and planning, 31 which may help adherence to social distancing, and isolation methods that may reduce risk of infection. Patients who adhere to their medication tend to be patients who suffer from more severe disease, 32 and may be more likely to self-isolate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%