2021
DOI: 10.35542/osf.io/xautd
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"What about teachers"? A duoethnographic exploration of ADHD in ELT

Abstract: The prevalence of ADHD in the general population is estimated at approximately 7.1% (Thomas et al., 2019). In spite of this, in the language education literature attention is given only to learners with the condition, whereas teachers are overlooked. The authors explore their teacher identities and experiences of teaching and training as well as living with ADHD. The interplay between teaching and ADHD is explored, and the authors hope that more attention is given to the condition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, for practitioners considering duoethnography as an easy way to get something published, I would say that it can be much more time-consuming to produce a piece of work in this way, from planning to publishing, than it can be for other methods, mainly because you have to consider your co-author’s working style and schedule. The fastest duoethnography I have had published took under a year (Jones & Bruzzano, 2023), and the slowest is coming up to two years (Jones & Noble, 2023). I found it much easier to collect interview data from six participants and write it up alone (Jones, 2020)! Rob: Yes, I think you’ve highlighted very effectively the possibility that duoethnography could retain a veneer of methodological radicalism while actually causing potential action to regress into talk.…”
Section: Theme 1: Accessibility and Potential Misusementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, for practitioners considering duoethnography as an easy way to get something published, I would say that it can be much more time-consuming to produce a piece of work in this way, from planning to publishing, than it can be for other methods, mainly because you have to consider your co-author’s working style and schedule. The fastest duoethnography I have had published took under a year (Jones & Bruzzano, 2023), and the slowest is coming up to two years (Jones & Noble, 2023). I found it much easier to collect interview data from six participants and write it up alone (Jones, 2020)! Rob: Yes, I think you’ve highlighted very effectively the possibility that duoethnography could retain a veneer of methodological radicalism while actually causing potential action to regress into talk.…”
Section: Theme 1: Accessibility and Potential Misusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting paper (Lowe & Kiczkowiak, 2016) was well received, and this encouraged me to engage more with the method, eventually leading to a co-edited book on the topic (Lowe & Lawrence, 2020). In Japan, I consider myself part of a small, informal group of duoethnographers who have produced studies on a variety of subjects using the method (e.g., see Hooper & Iijima, 2019;Jones & Noble, 2023;Lawrence & Nagashima, 2020;Nagashima & Lawrence, 2022). In my early work I conducted my research from a poststructural perspective, but in recent years I have begun to move in a direction influenced by the post-Marxist critical theory of the early Frankfurt School.…”
Section: Introduction and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation