Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2002.1188463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WF/sup 2/Q-M : a worst-case fair weighted fair queueing with maximum rate control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this issue, over the last decade, there has been a slew of proposals in the literature on how to improve congestion control in datacenters and efficiently share network bandwidth among competing flows and applications. Some of these proposals focus on providing per-flow fairness [18,20,34] with various network-level objectives, such as minimizing per-packet latency [25] or flow completion time [5,6,44] using network-level properties, such as flow size or deadlines [5,6,13,25,44,55]. Other works aim to provide isolation among tenants or applications when running in shared datacenters [11,12,23,27,32,48,57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue, over the last decade, there has been a slew of proposals in the literature on how to improve congestion control in datacenters and efficiently share network bandwidth among competing flows and applications. Some of these proposals focus on providing per-flow fairness [18,20,34] with various network-level objectives, such as minimizing per-packet latency [25] or flow completion time [5,6,44] using network-level properties, such as flow size or deadlines [5,6,13,25,44,55]. Other works aim to provide isolation among tenants or applications when running in shared datacenters [11,12,23,27,32,48,57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%