2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jat.2005.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weyl–Titchmarsh theory for CMV operators associated with orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle

Abstract: We provide a detailed treatment of Weyl-Titchmarsh theory for half-lattice and full-lattice CMV operators and discuss their systems of orthonormal Laurent polynomials on the unit circle, spectral functions, variants of Weyl-Titchmarsh functions, and Green's functions. In particular, we discuss the corresponding spectral representations of half-lattice and full-lattice CMV operators.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The one difference is that since δ(x) is not in L 2 , we do not have the analog of (2.23). However, 18) which implies that 19) and that suffices to define an inverse transform on L 2 (…”
Section: Theorem 32 R(λ) Is Given By (314)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The one difference is that since δ(x) is not in L 2 , we do not have the analog of (2.23). However, 18) which implies that 19) and that suffices to define an inverse transform on L 2 (…”
Section: Theorem 32 R(λ) Is Given By (314)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-sided CMV matrices were defined first in [40], although related objects appeared earlier in [3,10]. For further study, we mention [4,17,19,39].…”
Section: The CMV Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10. We require a way to relate the extended CMV operator E with the two one-sided CMV operators that comprise its two halves.…”
Section: Main Tools and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now let us demonstrate that δ 2n + 3 is in S 2n, 2n + 1 . We consider (10) and (11) once more, and this time by eliminating the δ 2n , δ 2n + 1 terms, we get…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%