1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf02902045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weyl and conformal covariant field theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Weyl invariance instead does impose constraints on the coupling constants. Our main conclusion is to confirm [14,15,16,22] that Weyl invariance and conformal invariance are independent symmetries: not every Weyl invariant theory is conformal invariant in the weak field limit and conversely, not every conformal invariant theory is Weyl invariant in spite of the fact that it is always invariant under global such Weyl transformations. To illustrate the first part of this statement, let us take for example the following WTDiff invariant theory…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, Weyl invariance instead does impose constraints on the coupling constants. Our main conclusion is to confirm [14,15,16,22] that Weyl invariance and conformal invariance are independent symmetries: not every Weyl invariant theory is conformal invariant in the weak field limit and conversely, not every conformal invariant theory is Weyl invariant in spite of the fact that it is always invariant under global such Weyl transformations. To illustrate the first part of this statement, let us take for example the following WTDiff invariant theory…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We can also look for the most general Lorentz and Weyl invariant lagrangian built with this kind of operators. Again, we need the dimension 4 operator part that will contribute with the Ophq piece of the Weyl variation, which already has two arbitrary constants appearing in it (22). Taking that piece into account, the most general Weyl invariant lagrangian up to dimension 5 operators reads…”
Section: Dimension 5 and Dimension 6 Operators (With 2 Derivatives)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the analysis of the previous section, we know that the dilatation transformation cannot play the role in varying the interaction vertex, since e Thus we choose K μ as a candidate to make γ μ (1 − γ 5 )A μ leave γ μ (1 − γ 5 ) and begin to run. It runs to normal interaction vertex γ μ , as shown in (43), which is for massive fermions. Now let's come back to the equation of our model.…”
Section: Generating Fermion Mass Term With the Help Of Conformal Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. To keep the invariance of x 2 1 + x 2 2 + x 2 3 = 0, one defines the matrix…”
Section: The Spatial and Spinor Representations For Conformal Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where formally we have used Λ ′µ ν to represent the scaling transformation to every coordinate component [57,59], [61][of which eq. (2)] instead of using the usual form e −α [64]. Slightly different from the operator µ d dµ appearing in renormalization group equation, here the operator D has the usual form D = i x ν ∂ ν , being a hermit one.…”
Section: The Physical Relationship Between the Two Representatiomentioning
confidence: 99%