1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-1717-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wetting Angles, Equilibrium Melt Geometry, and the Permeability Threshold of Partially Molten Crustal Protoliths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…contemporaneous deformation and associated pressure gradients lead to a melt connectivity transition that may be significantly lower than the 7 vol% estimated by Rosenberg & Handy (2005) and lower than the upper limit for the percolation threshold of 3.4 vol% suggested by Laporte et al (1997). As figure 4a shows, the distribution of melt is relatively uniform with no tendency to form veins, although most of the former melt occurs as connected arrays up to five grain diameters long located along grain boundaries that lie within 20…”
Section: (B) What Data Do We Have and How May We Use Them?mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…contemporaneous deformation and associated pressure gradients lead to a melt connectivity transition that may be significantly lower than the 7 vol% estimated by Rosenberg & Handy (2005) and lower than the upper limit for the percolation threshold of 3.4 vol% suggested by Laporte et al (1997). As figure 4a shows, the distribution of melt is relatively uniform with no tendency to form veins, although most of the former melt occurs as connected arrays up to five grain diameters long located along grain boundaries that lie within 20…”
Section: (B) What Data Do We Have and How May We Use Them?mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Within the first few per cent of melt production, the melt reaches the melt connectivity transition in all common crustal protoliths (Laporte et al 1997;Rosenberg & Handy 2005), although not necessarily at a common temperature (for a constant pressure or depth) and, therefore, not at the same time. The development of permeability enables advective melt flow from grain boundaries to veins, assuming dilatancy collapse by shear-enhanced compaction of the matrix (Rutter & Mecklenburgh 2006); this may occur earlier in some horizons than in others.…”
Section: (B) From the Initiation Of Melting To The Melt Connectivity mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distances between the studied Grt in this rock, therefore, are at least in the range of a few cm. Melt interconnetion in partially melted metasedimentary rocks is expected to occur at the temperatures registered in the migmatites (≥800 ºC; Laporte et al 1997;Clemens 2006, and references therein). However, the interconnected melt is likely to be compositionally heterogeneous due to the sluggish diffusion of Si and Al in melt (Acosta-Vigil et al 2006a, 2012b.…”
Section: Significance Of Glass Compositions In Remelted Nanogranitoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parameter of primary importance in this context is the permeability threshold 0c, that is, the volume percentage of fluid at which fluid interconnection is established. and Watson, 1991]; quartz-, biotite-, and hornblende-silicic melt [Laporte, 1994;Laporte and Watson, 1995]; and plagioclase-silicate melt [Longhi and Jurewicz, 1995;Laporte et al, 1997]. The systematic observation of crystal faces indicates that the assumption of isotropic surface energies is not a good one for silicate-fluid systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%