2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wetting and spreading behavior of molten iron in contact with graphite substrate: Interfacial effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, research on the wetting behavior of carbonaceous materials and molten iron predominantly focuses on the interaction between molten iron and graphite, coke, charcoal, and synthetic materials. [7][8][9] For instance, Nguyen et al [10] investigated the changes and reactions in interfacial wettability between molten iron with varying carbon content and high-purity graphite substrate. Cham et al [11,12] examined the interfacial reactions between graphite, coke with different mineral content, and molten iron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, research on the wetting behavior of carbonaceous materials and molten iron predominantly focuses on the interaction between molten iron and graphite, coke, charcoal, and synthetic materials. [7][8][9] For instance, Nguyen et al [10] investigated the changes and reactions in interfacial wettability between molten iron with varying carbon content and high-purity graphite substrate. Cham et al [11,12] examined the interfacial reactions between graphite, coke with different mineral content, and molten iron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This necessitates the urgent requirement for low-carbon BF operation; however, pulverized coal or other substitute fuels cannot replace coke's mechanical role in providing the permeability to the upward owing gases in the BF [2][3][4][5]. The low-carbon BF operation may result in the thinning of the coke layer, which causes the instability of burden mixing, reduction in furnace permeability, gas channeling, and a delay in the reduction reaction, all of which considerably impact the smooth BF operation [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This necessitates the urgent requirement for low-carbon BF operation; however, pulverized coal or other substitute fuels cannot replace coke’s mechanical role in providing the permeability to the upward flowing gases in the BF 2 – 5 . The low-carbon BF operation may result in the thinning of the coke layer, which causes the instability of burden mixing, reduction in furnace permeability, gas channeling, and a delay in the reduction reaction, all of which considerably impact the smooth BF operation 6 10 . Furthermore, the coke layer thinning weakens the solid–liquid carburization process when liquid iron passes via the coke, which lowers the carbon concentration in hot metal and deepens the corrosion of the unsaturated liquid iron to the hearth refractory 11 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%