2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3456100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wetting and energetics in nanoparticle etching of graphene

Abstract: Molten metallic nanoparticles have recently been used to construct graphene nanostructures with crystallographic edges. The mechanism by which this happens, however, remains unclear. Here, we present a simple model that explains how a droplet can etch graphene. Two factors possibly contribute to this process: a difference between the equilibrium wettability of graphene and the substrate that supports it, or the large surface energy associated with the graphene edge. We calculate the etching velocities due to e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7(a) and 7(b)]. 89) Loop formation is another way to modify edge reconstruction. It is a surface-driven process, in which reactive edges, sp 2 -hybridized surfaces and interfaces play a role.…”
Section: Edge Reconstruction (Or Structural Modification) Through Chementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(a) and 7(b)]. 89) Loop formation is another way to modify edge reconstruction. It is a surface-driven process, in which reactive edges, sp 2 -hybridized surfaces and interfaces play a role.…”
Section: Edge Reconstruction (Or Structural Modification) Through Chementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] To better control the cutting process,t he underlying atomic mechanisms should be understood. [21][22][23][24] Currently,the unzipping mechanism [7,[25][26][27] is the dominant graphene-cutting mechanism reported in the literature,w here C À Cb onds in graphene are broken by single cutting atoms and the nanoparticle size is thus irrelevant. However,s ignificant nanoparticle size effects on both the cutting behavior and the resulting graphene edge morphology have been observed experimentally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] To better control the cutting process, the underlying atomic mechanisms should be understood. [21][22][23][24] Currently, the unzipping mechanism [7,[25][26][27] is the dominant graphene-cutting mechanism reported in the literature, where C À C bonds in graphene are broken by single cutting atoms and the nanoparticle size is thus irrelevant. However, significant nanoparticle size effects on both the cutting behavior and the resulting graphene edge morphology have been observed experimentally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%