1974
DOI: 10.1080/0028825x.1974.10428872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wettability of leaves of a selection of New Zealand plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several data about the surface wettability of leaves of single species exist in literature, but only a few publications present a general overview of a larger number of species (Martin & Juniper 1970;Rentschler 1971;Hall & Burke 1974). investigated the surface structures of over 200 water-repellent plant species, and concluded that most of them showed hierarchical surface structures, formed by convex to papillose epidermal cells and a very dense arrangement of three-dimensional epicuticular waxes of different shapes.…”
Section: Superhydrophobicity Plant Surfaces (A ) Structures For Supermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several data about the surface wettability of leaves of single species exist in literature, but only a few publications present a general overview of a larger number of species (Martin & Juniper 1970;Rentschler 1971;Hall & Burke 1974). investigated the surface structures of over 200 water-repellent plant species, and concluded that most of them showed hierarchical surface structures, formed by convex to papillose epidermal cells and a very dense arrangement of three-dimensional epicuticular waxes of different shapes.…”
Section: Superhydrophobicity Plant Surfaces (A ) Structures For Supermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens IÁIV are consistent with this description (Table A1.1), while specimens V and VI are not quite as effective. Hall & Burke (1974) identified other hydrophobic New Zealand plants, including two natives (Acama anserinifolia and Chionochloa rubra) with advCA 1508 or greater (Table A1.2). Contact angle data for the lotus and V. albicans are comparable to the values obtained by (1628 and 1658, respectively) and a recent review (Guo et al 2011) also quoted a contact angle of 'around 1628' for the lotus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In selecting specimens, our aim was to identify particularly water repellent plants. Hall & Burke (1974) measured advancing contact angles and imaged microstructures for c. 50 New Zealand plants (not exclusively natives) and cited relevant earlier work. Notable surveys of exotic water repellent plants include the work of , who catalogued contact angles and microstructures for c. 200 species, and Wagner et al (2003), who quantitatively compared wetting properties with structure for 33 species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on plant leaf wettability has been carried out by many authors (Hall and Burke 1974;Barthlott and Neinhuis 1997;Brewer and Smith 1997;Brewer and Nunez 2007;Holder 2007;Fernández et al 2014). Comparing wettability results is not easy, since the leaf wettability (adaxial side) has been proved to change throughout the growing season (Van Wittenberghe et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%