1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.1996.tb01265.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wettability and Contaminability of Insect Wings as a Function of Their Surface Sculptures

Abstract: Wagner, T., Neinhuis, C. & Barthlott, W. 1996. Wettability and contaminability of insect wings as a function of their surface sculptures. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 76: 213-225.The wing surfaces of 97 insect species from virtually all relevant major groups were examined by high resolution scanning-electron-microscopy, in order to identify the relationships between the wing microstructures, their wettability with water and their behaviour under the influence of contamination.Isolated wings with contact angles b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
339
3
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 449 publications
(363 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
339
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In insects a dense grid of very short hair-like structures on the wing are thought to primarily make the wing water repellent (18). Flight control is achieved by different structures, some of which are located at the wing base or on the wing margin, others are located elsewhere on the insect's body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In insects a dense grid of very short hair-like structures on the wing are thought to primarily make the wing water repellent (18). Flight control is achieved by different structures, some of which are located at the wing base or on the wing margin, others are located elsewhere on the insect's body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrotrichia have been found to add a secondary layer of protection against surfaces with which the insect may come into contact (Watson et al 2010b). The lacewing surface of the species Chrysoperla carnea has been previously studied where the wing was exposed to a fine dust of silica particles under fogging conditions and was shown to exhibit a high degree of non-contaminability (Wagner et al 1996).…”
Section: Superhydrophobic Cuticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional weight due to contamination (water and/or contaminating particles) can potentially have a detrimental effect on the insects' flight capabilities (Wagner et al 1996). Wagner et al (1996) demonstrated a correlation between contaminability, wettability and the wing area of many insects. They exposed insect specimens to a fine silica dust and fogging conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79 The now commonly accepted meaning of a superhydrophobic surface is a surface on which the water (advancing) contact angle is at least 150°, and the contact angle hysteresis as well as the sliding (or rolling off) angle (sliding/rolling angle is the minimum angle of sloped solid at which water (liquid) drop rolls off the surface) do not exceed 5-10° (Table 2). Although currently superhydrophobic surfaces are inspired by biological specimens, [80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97] the early research was inspired by the practical need to enhance coating repellency of water and snow. 98,99 These days, superhydrophobic coatings are manufactured by chemical, physical and/or mechanical modifications of both organic and inorganic materials.…”
Section: 78mentioning
confidence: 99%