2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12132095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wetland Mapping with Landsat 8 OLI, Sentinel-1, ALOS-1 PALSAR, and LiDAR Data in Southern New Brunswick, Canada

Abstract: Mapping wetlands with high spatial and thematic accuracy is crucial for the management and monitoring of these important ecosystems. Wetland maps in New Brunswick (NB) have traditionally been produced by the visual interpretation of aerial photographs. In this study, we used an alternative method to produce a wetland map for southern New Brunswick, Canada, by classifying a combination of Landsat 8 OLI, ALOS-1 PALSAR, Sentinel-1, and LiDAR-derived topographic metrics with the Random Forests (RF) classif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(114 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supervised classifications (including machine and deep learning) are one of the most common classifiers for land cover and wetland applications [259,[264][265][266][267]. Supervised classifiers require a reference dataset, referred to as 'training data', correlate class labels with pixel-associated data, and are used to train the algorithm to classify all pixels within the image.…”
Section: Supervised Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised classifications (including machine and deep learning) are one of the most common classifiers for land cover and wetland applications [259,[264][265][266][267]. Supervised classifiers require a reference dataset, referred to as 'training data', correlate class labels with pixel-associated data, and are used to train the algorithm to classify all pixels within the image.…”
Section: Supervised Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the results show that wetland studies using remotely sensed data in Zimbabwe mainly rely on free software, ILWIS in particular. To improve the EO‐based analyses of wetland ecological studies, there is a need to explore utilisation of a wide range of other free software that have been applied in other countries such as Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) GIS (Neteler et al., 2012), Google Earth Engine (Hardy et al., 2020), System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) GIS (LaRocque et al., 2020) and Water Observation and Information System (WOIS; Guzinski, Kass, Huber, Bauer‐Gottwein, Jensen & Naeimi, 2014; Guzinski, Kass, Huber, Bauer‐Gottwein, Jensen, Naeimi, Doubkova, et al, 2014; Makapela et al., 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML, SVM, k-NN, DT, NN, and ISODATA with the median overall accuracies between 83% and 85% were the mid-range classifiers. The best (97.67%) and worst (62.40%) overall accuracies were achieved by RF [117] and Other [118] classifiers, respectively. There are different wetland classification strategies.…”
Section: Table A1mentioning
confidence: 99%