1985
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1985.166.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wet and Waxy Shoots in Radiata Pine Micropropagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This change may have occurred because successive monthly crops of axillary shoots were being formed nearer the top of the container, and away from the agar and liquid surface where humidity was likely to have been higher and where liquid remained on the surface of the needles. Proximity of shoots to the medium has been implicated previously as a factor in the formation of wet and waxy shoots [1]. This is the first report of a hedging system for shoot production in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This change may have occurred because successive monthly crops of axillary shoots were being formed nearer the top of the container, and away from the agar and liquid surface where humidity was likely to have been higher and where liquid remained on the surface of the needles. Proximity of shoots to the medium has been implicated previously as a factor in the formation of wet and waxy shoots [1]. This is the first report of a hedging system for shoot production in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Waxy shoots have been shown to be the best type of shoot for rooting, whereas wet shoots have poor survival rates and are undesirable [1]. Formation of increasingly more waxy shoots from what were originally wet shoot clumps was an unexpected bonus of the liquid-nutrient replenishment system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shoot height was significant in Douglas fir [20] and radiata pine [133], where 4 cm for fir and 2.4-2.7 cm for pine were best for rooting. 'Vitrification' [79] or 'translucence' [3,152] has resulted in lower rooting in sitka spruce [79], Norway spruce [152] and radiata pine [3], and was also associated with poor survival during acclimatization. Vitrification has many causes but can often be prevented by high gel concentration and low BA in the medium [110,154].…”
Section: Other Factors Which Affect Rootingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comm.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) [11], shoot quality [23] and root system morphology [2,13] for loblolly pine and white spruce [20], and the presence of roots for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) [22]. No reports are available for Douglas fir which is a species of considerable economic interest in the Pacific Northwest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%