2016
DOI: 10.1190/geo2015-0581.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wet and gassy zones in a municipal landfill from P- and S-wave velocity fields

Abstract: The knowledge of the distribution of leachate and gas in a municipal landfill is of vital importance to the landfill operators performing improved landfill treatments and for environmental protection and efficient biogas extraction. We have explored the potential of using the velocity fields of seismic S-and P-waves to delineate the wet and gassy (relatively dry, gas/air-filled) zones inside a landfill. We have analyzed shallow S-and P-wave reflection data and seismic surface-wave data acquired at a very heter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it can be seen in Fig. 14 that it is in agreement with the values derived by Konstantaki et al (2016) from MASW (Rayleigh and Love waves) and S-wave seismic reflection data using the same relationship (Fig. 14).…”
Section: Unit Weightsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, it can be seen in Fig. 14 that it is in agreement with the values derived by Konstantaki et al (2016) from MASW (Rayleigh and Love waves) and S-wave seismic reflection data using the same relationship (Fig. 14).…”
Section: Unit Weightsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similar velocities were obtained for landfills in Switzerland (300-800 m/s; Lanz et al 1998;De Iaco et al 2003) and USA (350-550 m/s; Carpenter et al 2013). Konstantaki et al (2016) obtained particularly low P-wave velocities (150-200 m/s) in a landfill in the Netherlands, and attributed these to the presence of biogas (which could be the case at Hvalsø).…”
Section: D Seismic Refraction Surveyssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For small additions of gas, v P drops significantly (Anderson and Hampton 1980), due mostly to the effect of gas on the bulk compressibility of the sediment volume. Velocity values of 170-200 m/s are calculated with the addition of gas, consistent with Anderson and Hampton (1980) for gas saturations greater than 1% and Konstantaki et al (2016) and Angioni et al (2003) at shallow onshore sites. Of course, higher velocities than this are plausible, attributable to local velocity averaging in gassy and non-gassy sediment and/or a prevalence of smaller-sized bubbles in the total gas volume (Wilkens and Richardson 1998).…”
Section: Model Inputssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Velocity values of 170–200 m/s are calculated with the addition of gas, consistent with Anderson and Hampton () for gas saturations greater than 1% and Konstantaki et al . () and Angioni et al . () at shallow onshore sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%