Western Australian schools access to dentally optimal fluoridated water

Abstract

Background: This study examined water fluoride levels at schools across Western Australia. The aim was to identify schools where levels of water fluoride appeared to be below dental health thresholds (0.5-1.0 mg/L) as recommended by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). The objective is to provide health organizations with the knowledge for a more targeted approach to schools with greater risk of decay. Methods: Population data, school location, enrolment data and water quality data were integrated into geographic databases for analysis using Quantum GIS, Lisboa 1.8. Results:The results indicated that 46% of school attendees in the northern half of Western Australia were at schools where there was the potential that the water was not dentally optimally fluoridated while in the southern half of Western Australia this was about 10%. Of these attendees (north and south), 45% were at primary school. Similarly, there was an association between socio-economic decile and proportion of school attendees in non-dentally optimally fluoridated schools. Lower deciles (i.e. poorer attendees) had a greater risk of being in schools outside dentally optimally fluoridated areas. Conclusions: This study clearly highlights areas where more prevention (and probably) treatment needs are present and provides a framework for targeted service planning.

Children's oral health in Australia: The past decade's research agenda

“…A strength of having a widely used statistical index for local area resources in Australia allows for easy investigation of this influence on oral health. Previous research has found, children residing in low SEIFA areas are associated with poorer indicators of oral health (ie, caries) and other risk factors or influences (ie, oral hygiene behaviours and dental service use) . Future studies should consider using more direct measures of social capital such as social capital scales …”

“…Previous research has found, children residing in low SEIFA areas are associated with poorer indicators of oral health (ie, caries) and other risk factors or influences (ie, oral hygiene behaviours and dental service use). [42][43][44][45] Future studies should consider using more direct measures of social capital such as social capital scales. 46…”