2013
DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2013.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

West Palaearctic species of the genus Diostracus Loew, 1861 (Diptera: Dolichopodidae)

Abstract: A new status (as subgenera of Diostracus Loew, 1861) for Sphyrotarsus Mik, 1874, Lagodechia Negrobov & Tsurikov, 1996 and Ozmena Özdikmen, 2010 stat. nov. is proposed. A new species, Diostracus (Sphyrotarsus) kustovi sp. nov., is described from the Russian Caucasus. The following recombinations (comb. nov.) are also proposed: Diostracus (Sphyrotarsus) argyrostomus (Mik, 1874); D. (S.) caucasicus (Negrobov, 1965); D. (S.) hervebazini (Parent, 1914); D. (S.) hessei (Parent, 1914); D. (S.) hygrophilus (Becker… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 748 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Argyra leucocephala (Meigen, 1824) Becker, 1908 andSyntormon zelleri (Loew, 1850) from that collection were reported from Iran for the first time (Grichanov et al 2010). Later Sciapus iranicus Grichanov, Negrobov was described from the same collection as new for science (Grichanov, Negrobov, 2014 (Stackelberg, 1933), P. basilicus (Loew, 1869), P. chrysozygos (Wiedemann, 1817) and P. comitialis (Kowarz, 1867) (Khaghaninia et al, 2013b); Diaphorus sublautus Negrobov, 2007, Dolichopus austriacus Parent, 1927, D. campestris Meigen, 1824, D. immaculatus Becker, 1909, D. subpennatus d'Assis Fonseca, 1976, D. ungulatus (Linnaeus, 1758 and Hercostomus phoebus Parent, 1927 ; Chrysotimus molliculus (Fallén, 1823); Hercostomus apollo (Loew, 1869); Hydrophorus balticus (Meigen, 1824); Medetera meridionalis Negrobov, 1967;Orthoceratium lacustre (Scopoli, 1763) and Poecilobothrus principalis (Loew, 1861) (Kazerani et al, 2014a). A new species Dolichopus malekii Grichanov, Khaghaninia, Gharajedaghi was described from the East Azerbaijan province .…”
Section: Review Of Faunal Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Argyra leucocephala (Meigen, 1824) Becker, 1908 andSyntormon zelleri (Loew, 1850) from that collection were reported from Iran for the first time (Grichanov et al 2010). Later Sciapus iranicus Grichanov, Negrobov was described from the same collection as new for science (Grichanov, Negrobov, 2014 (Stackelberg, 1933), P. basilicus (Loew, 1869), P. chrysozygos (Wiedemann, 1817) and P. comitialis (Kowarz, 1867) (Khaghaninia et al, 2013b); Diaphorus sublautus Negrobov, 2007, Dolichopus austriacus Parent, 1927, D. campestris Meigen, 1824, D. immaculatus Becker, 1909, D. subpennatus d'Assis Fonseca, 1976, D. ungulatus (Linnaeus, 1758 and Hercostomus phoebus Parent, 1927 ; Chrysotimus molliculus (Fallén, 1823); Hercostomus apollo (Loew, 1869); Hydrophorus balticus (Meigen, 1824); Medetera meridionalis Negrobov, 1967;Orthoceratium lacustre (Scopoli, 1763) and Poecilobothrus principalis (Loew, 1861) (Kazerani et al, 2014a). A new species Dolichopus malekii Grichanov, Khaghaninia, Gharajedaghi was described from the East Azerbaijan province .…”
Section: Review Of Faunal Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Grichanov [2013] for diagnosis of the genus. Grichanov [2013] recognised 4 subgenera of the genus, i.e. Diostracus Loew, 1861, Sphyrotarsus Mik, 1874, Lagodechia Negrobov, Tsurikov, 1996, and Ozmena Özdikmen, 2010.…”
Section: Genus Diostracus Loew 1861mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Grichanov [2013], the new species belongs to the subgenus Lagodechia, which differs from other subgenera in the absence of dorsal setae on antennal scape, presence of 1 pair of long bristles on scutellum, short postpedicel with dorsal stylus [Negrobov, Tsurikov, 1996]. Following the key to Chinese species [Yang et al, 2011], the new species is close to ungrouped D. nishiyamai Saigusa, 1995 (here associated with the subgenus Lagodechia), which has entirely simple wing, tibiae and tarsi, and oval male cercus.…”
Section: Genus Diostracus Loew 1861mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Grichanov's key (2006), S. filiger females differ from those of close species of the genus in mainly dark fore coxa bearing mostly black hairs and setae; mid coxa with one black seta; fore tibia without serration; frons mat; lower calypter with black cilia. Until recently, some keys, catalogs and checklists (e.g., Negrobov, 1991;Grichanov, 2006) placed S. rufipes (Meigen, 1824) in synonymy to S. pumilus (Meigen, 1824) or considered it a valid species (now an unrecognized species of Rhaphium, see Grichanov, 2013), ignoring a new name Syntormon filiger Verrall, 1912 for Syntormon rufipes (Zetterstedt, 1849, et alii auct. ), nec Meigen, 1824 (misidentification); therefore, old records of S. rufipes and S. pumilus from the Leningrad Region (Stackelberg, 1962) must be confirmed, because they could belong to S. filiger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%