West meets East: How do rainforest beetles become circum-Pacific? Evolutionary origin of Callipogon relictus and allied species (Cerambycidae: Prioninae) in the New and Old Worlds

Kim, Sang Il; Medeiros, Bruno A. S. de; Byun, Bong‐Kyu; Lee, Seung Hwan; Kang, Jung-Hoon; Lee, Bongwoo; Farrell, Brian D.

doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2018.02.019

Cited by 22 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This applies in particular to the large clade D, which is composed of taxa previously classified in various tribes. Kim et al (2018) excluded the genus Cacodacnus from the tribe Callipogonini as its sequence was very distant to Callipogon; the same result also was recovered by our analyses. The genus Toxeutes was traditionally placed in the Aegosomatini, but was found to be distant from the type genus of the tribe Aegosoma Audinet-Serville in our results.…”

Section: Tribal Classification Of Australian Prioninaesupporting

confidence: 79%

“…The Thomson-Lacordaire-Lameere system has been further improved by mostly regional revisions (e.g., Galileo, 1987aGalileo, , 1987b, but unfortunately -to date -there has been no phylogenetic analysis of the higher taxa of Prioninae, and relationships between recognized tribes and their generic constituents have not been tested. The only molecular study that involves more than a few Prioninae is that of Kim et al (2018), which included 44 species of Prioninae outside of their main focus group Callipogonini and is based on only four loci with very low support along the backbone of the tree.…”

Section: Tribal Classification Of Australian Prioninaementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In spite of constant taxonomic activity in Prioninae worldwide, only part of the Neotropical fauna has been thoroughly revised (Galileo, 1987a;Galileo, 1987b;Galileo & Martins, 1992;Monné, 2006). Limited molecular research in this group (Kim et al, 2018) has revealed strong incongruence between morphological classification and molecular evidence, suggesting a need for revision of the current tribal and generic limits, to achieve a natural classification. Unsurprisingly, the generic and tribal classification of the 24 genera and 52 described species of Australian Prioninae (Titan database, http://titan.gbif.fr/index.html, accessed 5 June 2019) also is problematic.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Museomics reveals extensive cryptic diversity of Australian prionine longhorn beetles with implications for their classification and conservation

Jin

Zwick

Ślipiński

et al. 2020

Systematic Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We combined museum collection genomics and morphology to identify new genera and species, and to otherwise revise the taxonomy of the poorly understood Australian longhorn beetles in the subfamily Prioninae. Moreover, we produced a comprehensive DNA reference library for molecular species identification and a first comprehensive molecular phylogeny for all Australian Prioninae, using mitogenomic data. The Prioninae include some of the world's largest beetles, and their long‐lived larvae are major recyclers of solid dead timber, yet these longhorn beetles are rarely seen in nature due to their concealed habits, short adult lifespans and nocturnal habits. Furthermore, many species are difficult to identify using morphological characters. We applied Whole Genome Shotgun (WGS) sequencing to 213 historical museum specimens, representing all morphological types of Australian Prioninae. Complete mitochondrial genomes were obtained for all genera, and at least one mitochondrial protein‐coding gene (PCG) was acquired for an additional 141 specimens of Australian Prioninae. Using molecular species delimitation tools, we identified 48 new species of Australian Prioninae, nearly doubling the number of currently recognized Australian species of Prioninae. We assign generic status to Catypnes Pascoe, 1864 stat.r. and Hermerius Newman, 1844 stat.r., propose a new synonymy for Cnemoplites Newman, 1842 (= Paroplites Lameere, 1903 syn.n.), describe six new genera, including Paulhutchinsonia Jin, de Keyzer & Ślipiński gen.n., Papunya Jin, de Keyzer & Ślipiński gen.n., Dunmorium Jin, de Keyzer & Ślipiński gen.n., Hagrides Jin, de Keyzer & Ślipiński gen.n., Cryptipus Jin, de Keyzer & Ślipiński gen.n., Geoffmonteithia Jin, de Keyzer & Ślipiński gen.n., and revise the tribal composition of the Australian Macrotomini. Moreover, our phylogeny of Prioninae provides valuable new insights into the evolutionary origins and nearest relatives of several Australian endemic taxa. Our results emphasize the importance of natural history museums as a repository for information about biodiversity, and highlight the opportunities associated with using museum specimens as a source for molecular data in phylogenetic studies.

show abstract

Section: Tribal Classification Of Australian Prioninaesupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Tribal Classification Of Australian Prioninaementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Museomics reveals extensive cryptic diversity of Australian prionine longhorn beetles with implications for their classification and conservation

Jin

Zwick

Ślipiński

et al. 2020

Systematic Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The phylogenetic relationships within Cerambycidae have yet to be fully resolved due to a lack of adequately convincing taxon sampling, and the monophyly of subfamilies within Cerambycidae need further discussion (Haddad et al, 2018; Kim et al, 2018). With the aim to discuss the monophyly of subfamilies of Cerambycidae and gene arrangements of the mitogenome, complete mitogenomes of the five longicorn beetle species were determined.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The complete mitochondrial genomes of five longicorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and phylogenetic relationships within Cerambycidae

Wang

Dai

et al. 2019

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cerambycidae is one of the most diversified groups within Coleoptera and includes nearly 35,000 known species. The relationships at the subfamily level within Cerambycidae have not been convincingly demonstrated and the gene rearrangement of mitochondrial genomes in Cerambycidae remains unclear due to the low numbers of sequenced mitogenomes. In the present study, we determined five complete mitogenomes of Cerambycidae and investigated the phylogenetic relationship among the subfamilies of Cerambycidae based on mitogenomes. The mitogenomic arrangement of all five species was identical to the ancestral Cerambycidae type without gene rearrangement. Remarkably, however, two large intergenic spacers were detected in the mitogenome of Pterolophia sp. ZJY-2019. The origins of these intergenic spacers could be explained by the slipped-strand mispairing and duplication/random loss models. A conserved motif was found between trnS2 and nad1 gene, which was proposed to be a binding site of a transcription termination peptide. Also, tandem repeat units were identified in the A + T-rich region of all five mitogenomes. The monophyly of Lamiinae and Prioninae was strongly supported by both MrBayes and RAxML analyses based on nucleotide datasets, whereas the Cerambycinae and Lepturinae were recovered as non-monophyletic.

show abstract

“…The phylogenetic relationships within Cerambycidae have yet to be fully resolved due to a lack of adequately convincing taxon sampling, and the monophyly of subfamilies within Cerambycidae need further discuss (Haddad et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2018). With the aim to discuss the monophyly of subfamilies of Cerambycidae and gene arrangements of the mitogenome, complete mitogenomes of the five longicorn beetle species were determined.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer Review #2 of "The complete mitochondrial genomes of five longicorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and phylogenetic relationships within Cerambycidae (v0.1)"

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cerambycidae is one of the most diversified groups within Coleoptera and includes nearly 35,000 known species. The relationships at the subfamily level within Cerambycidae have not been convincingly demonstrated and the gene rearrangement of mitochondrial genomes in Cerambycidae remains unclear due to the low numbers of sequenced mitogenomes. In the present study, we determined five complete mitogenomes of Cerambycidae and investigated the phylogenetic relationship among the subfamilies of Cerambycidae based on mitogenomes. The mitogenomic arrangement of all five species was identical to the ancestral Cerambycidae type without gene rearrangement. Remarkably, however, two large intergenic spacers were detected in the mitogenome of Pterolophia sp. ZJY-2019. The origins of these intergenic spacers could be explained by the slipped-strand mispairing and duplication/random loss models. A conserved motif was found between trnS2 and nad1 gene, which was proposed to be a binding site of a transcription termination peptide. Also, tandem repeat units were identified in the A+T-rich region of all five mitogenomes. The monophyly of Lamiinae and Prioninae was strongly supported by both MrBayes and RAxML analyses based on nucleotide datasets, whereas the Cerambycinae and Lepturinae were recovered as non-monophyletic.

show abstract

West meets East: How do rainforest beetles become circum-Pacific? Evolutionary origin of Callipogon relictus and allied species (Cerambycidae: Prioninae) in the New and Old Worlds

Cited by 22 publications

References 60 publications

Museomics reveals extensive cryptic diversity of Australian prionine longhorn beetles with implications for their classification and conservation

Museomics reveals extensive cryptic diversity of Australian prionine longhorn beetles with implications for their classification and conservation

The complete mitochondrial genomes of five longicorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and phylogenetic relationships within Cerambycidae

Peer Review #2 of "The complete mitochondrial genomes of five longicorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and phylogenetic relationships within Cerambycidae (v0.1)"

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About