1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02229089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

West Indian archaeology. 2. After Columbus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
12
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is errant to project ethnohistoric sources onto the past in an attempt to elucidate the archaeological record (Wobst 1978;Wylie 1985). Extrapolations of contact period written sources applied to the archaeological record from centuries before are problematic due to cultural changes (i.e., which plants were used and how they were processed) due to the magnitude of disruption from European invasions, systematic colonization, and enslavements (Denevan 1992;Jennings 1975;Keegan 1996;Montenegro and Stephens 2006;Pagán-Jiménez 2009;Wilson 1993). For these reasons, we turned to archaeological data to illuminate phytocultural scenarios of a region in the northern Caribbean during the advent of European invasions.…”
Section: Regional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is errant to project ethnohistoric sources onto the past in an attempt to elucidate the archaeological record (Wobst 1978;Wylie 1985). Extrapolations of contact period written sources applied to the archaeological record from centuries before are problematic due to cultural changes (i.e., which plants were used and how they were processed) due to the magnitude of disruption from European invasions, systematic colonization, and enslavements (Denevan 1992;Jennings 1975;Keegan 1996;Montenegro and Stephens 2006;Pagán-Jiménez 2009;Wilson 1993). For these reasons, we turned to archaeological data to illuminate phytocultural scenarios of a region in the northern Caribbean during the advent of European invasions.…”
Section: Regional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These Arawak-speaking peoples from the Orinoco Valley may have admixed with, rather than replaced, existing Lithic/Archaic populations [30]. By the 15 th century, Europeans estimated indigenous population sizes of 100,000 to 6 million [31]. While Europeans have labeled many of these groups upon contact with various ethnonyms, such as Taino (Greater Antilles), Lucayan (Bahamas), and Caribs (Lesser Antilles, coastal South America), these labels were often problematic in their misinterpretation of existing political, ethnic, and linguistic diversity [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find the region divided among two principle culture-areas, but defined by the mainland, with the Greater Antilles an extension of Central America, and the Lesser Antilles culturally bridging to northern South America. The archipelago was essentially undifferentiated from mainland areas in cultural or social characteristics, although localized social and linguistic variation was evident (Keegan 1994(Keegan , 1996Wilson 1989). Following a century of depopulation beginning with Columbus, the region was artificially transformed-redefined politically and culturally-by the invading Europeans.…”
Section: Definitions In Time and Spacementioning
confidence: 98%