Abstract:This paper proposes a complete framework consisting pre-processing, modeling, and postprocessing stages to carry out well tops guided prediction of a reservoir property (sand fraction) from three seismic attributes (seismic impedance, instantaneous amplitude, and instantaneous frequency) using the concept of modular artificial neural network (MANN). The dataset used in this study comprising three seismic attributes and well log data from eight wells, is acquired from a western onshore hydrocarbon field of Indi… Show more
“…The improvement in mapping with introduction of the regularization step is observed from the performance analysis. The comparison among the results achieved in this work and existing literatures [17], [57] reveals the superiority of the proposed regularization step to obtain improved performance in terms of the performance evaluators. In the present study, synthetic SF logs are generated over the study area from available seismic information using the validated network parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The present work differs from the work done in [17] in terms of preprocessing stage, division of training-testing dataset, adopted machine learning technique, and postprocessing algorithm. In addition, the well tops and horizon information are used [17] to carry out zone-wise division of the overall dataset and modular ANN is applied to model SF from multiple seismic attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, normalization, relevant attributes selection, importance sampling, etc. have been part of the preprocessing technique in different fields such as environmental modeling [53], chemistry [54], biomedical [55], [56], and reservoir engineering [17], [57], [58]. Generally, CC values above 80%, RMSE, AEM values below 0.15, and SI value below 0.35 can be considered as good fit in such studies.…”
Section: Model Building and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between the validation performance (prediction using data not part of training) reported in [57] and those achieved in this study has revealed that the regularization stage improves the prediction result in terms of CC, AEM, and RMSE. The preprocessing step involving a single ANN in [17] is similar to the case in the present paper while modeling with original SF as target. Comparison among the ANN performances with and without the regularization step reveals that the results of ANN have improved in terms of evaluators in the former case.…”
Section: Model Building and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ANN has been used in climatological studies [7], ocean engineering [8], telecommunications [9], text recognition [10], financial time series [11], reservoir characterization (RC) [12]- [17], etc. A diverse dataset containing information assembled from multiple domains can be used for learning and validation of ANN.…”
This paper presents a novel preprocessing scheme to improve the prediction of sand fraction from multiple seismic attributes such as seismic impedance, amplitude, and frequency using machine learning and information filtering. The available well logs along with the three-dimensional (3-D) seismic data have been used to benchmark the proposed preprocessing stage using a methodology that primarily consists of three steps: 1) preprocessing; 2) training; and 3) postprocessing. An artificial neural network (ANN) with conjugate-gradient learning algorithm has been used to model the sand fraction. The available sand fraction data from the high-resolution well logs have far more information content than the low-resolution seismic attributes. Therefore, regularization schemes based on Fourier transform (FT), wavelet decomposition (WD), and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) have been proposed to shape the high-resolution sand fraction data for effective machine learning. The input data sets have been segregated into training, testing, and validation sets. The test results are primarily used to check different network structures and activation function performances. Once the network passes the testing phase with an acceptable performance in terms of the selected evaluators, the validation phase follows. In the validation stage, the prediction model is tested against unseen data. The network yielding satisfactory performance in the validation stage is used to predict lithological properties from seismic attributes throughout a given volume. Finally, a postprocessing scheme using 3-D spatial filtering is implemented for smoothing the sand fraction in the volume. Prediction of lithological properties using this framework is helpful for reservoir characterization (RC).Index Terms-Artificial neural network (ANN), empirical mode decomposition (EMD), entropy, Fourier transform (FT), normalized mutual information (NMI), preprocessing, regularization, reservoir characterization (RC), sand fraction (SF), threedimensional (3-D) median filtering, wavelets.
“…The improvement in mapping with introduction of the regularization step is observed from the performance analysis. The comparison among the results achieved in this work and existing literatures [17], [57] reveals the superiority of the proposed regularization step to obtain improved performance in terms of the performance evaluators. In the present study, synthetic SF logs are generated over the study area from available seismic information using the validated network parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The present work differs from the work done in [17] in terms of preprocessing stage, division of training-testing dataset, adopted machine learning technique, and postprocessing algorithm. In addition, the well tops and horizon information are used [17] to carry out zone-wise division of the overall dataset and modular ANN is applied to model SF from multiple seismic attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, normalization, relevant attributes selection, importance sampling, etc. have been part of the preprocessing technique in different fields such as environmental modeling [53], chemistry [54], biomedical [55], [56], and reservoir engineering [17], [57], [58]. Generally, CC values above 80%, RMSE, AEM values below 0.15, and SI value below 0.35 can be considered as good fit in such studies.…”
Section: Model Building and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between the validation performance (prediction using data not part of training) reported in [57] and those achieved in this study has revealed that the regularization stage improves the prediction result in terms of CC, AEM, and RMSE. The preprocessing step involving a single ANN in [17] is similar to the case in the present paper while modeling with original SF as target. Comparison among the ANN performances with and without the regularization step reveals that the results of ANN have improved in terms of evaluators in the former case.…”
Section: Model Building and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ANN has been used in climatological studies [7], ocean engineering [8], telecommunications [9], text recognition [10], financial time series [11], reservoir characterization (RC) [12]- [17], etc. A diverse dataset containing information assembled from multiple domains can be used for learning and validation of ANN.…”
This paper presents a novel preprocessing scheme to improve the prediction of sand fraction from multiple seismic attributes such as seismic impedance, amplitude, and frequency using machine learning and information filtering. The available well logs along with the three-dimensional (3-D) seismic data have been used to benchmark the proposed preprocessing stage using a methodology that primarily consists of three steps: 1) preprocessing; 2) training; and 3) postprocessing. An artificial neural network (ANN) with conjugate-gradient learning algorithm has been used to model the sand fraction. The available sand fraction data from the high-resolution well logs have far more information content than the low-resolution seismic attributes. Therefore, regularization schemes based on Fourier transform (FT), wavelet decomposition (WD), and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) have been proposed to shape the high-resolution sand fraction data for effective machine learning. The input data sets have been segregated into training, testing, and validation sets. The test results are primarily used to check different network structures and activation function performances. Once the network passes the testing phase with an acceptable performance in terms of the selected evaluators, the validation phase follows. In the validation stage, the prediction model is tested against unseen data. The network yielding satisfactory performance in the validation stage is used to predict lithological properties from seismic attributes throughout a given volume. Finally, a postprocessing scheme using 3-D spatial filtering is implemented for smoothing the sand fraction in the volume. Prediction of lithological properties using this framework is helpful for reservoir characterization (RC).Index Terms-Artificial neural network (ANN), empirical mode decomposition (EMD), entropy, Fourier transform (FT), normalized mutual information (NMI), preprocessing, regularization, reservoir characterization (RC), sand fraction (SF), threedimensional (3-D) median filtering, wavelets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.