2019
DOI: 10.1090/proc/14820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Well-posedness of abstract integro-differential equations with state-dependent delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case of ordinary differential equations with SDA similar to Equations (1.1)–(1.2), we cite the early papers by Cooke [5], Dunkel [9], Eder [10] and Oberg [36]. Concerning abstract problems with applications to Partial differential equations (PDEs), we cite the pioneer papers [13, 24], our recent works [21, 22, 2326] and the interesting papers [2830, 34, 35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the case of ordinary differential equations with SDA similar to Equations (1.1)–(1.2), we cite the early papers by Cooke [5], Dunkel [9], Eder [10] and Oberg [36]. Concerning abstract problems with applications to Partial differential equations (PDEs), we cite the pioneer papers [13, 24], our recent works [21, 22, 2326] and the interesting papers [2830, 34, 35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to the early works [13, 24] and the papers [14, 13, 1618, 21, 22, 2326, 31, 32], we present several novelties. To begin, we prove the existence and ‘uniqueness of a non-Lipschitz’ solution for Equations (1.1)–(1.2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most crucial part of the analysis done in the recent papers [1, 3, 4, 29, 30] is that Hernández et al showed that SDD problems are not well posed in the space of continuous functions as the function uffalse(t,uσfalse(t,utfalse)false)$$ u\to f\left(t,{u}_{\sigma \left(t,{u}_t\right)}\right) $$ does not show the Lipschitz behavior. Further, they established inequality of the form alignleftalign-1align-2f(t,uσ(t,ut))f(t,vσ(t,vt))C([0,τ],X)align-1align-2Lf1+[v]CLip([r,τ],X)[σ]CLip([0,τ]×BX,+)uvC([r,τ],X),$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{ll}& {\left\Vert f\left(t,{u}_{\sigma \left(t,{u}_t\right)}\right)-f\Big(t,{v}_{\sigma \left(t,{v}_t\right)}\Big)\right\Vert}_{C\left(\left[0,\tau \right],X\right)}\\ {}\le & \kern0.2em {L}_f\left(1+{\left[v\right]}_{C_{\mathrm{Lip}}\left(\left[-r,\tau \right],X\right)}{\left[\sigma \right]}_{C_{\mathrm{Lip}}\left(\left[0,\tau \right]\times {\mathfrak{B}}_X,{\mathrm{\mathbb{R}}}^{+}\right)}\right){\left\Vert u-v\right\Vert}_{C\left(\left[-r,\tau \right],X\right)},\end{array}} $$ when all the functions are considered to be Lipschitz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning first order ODEs on finite dimensional spaces, we mention the survey [5]. For first order ordinary abstract differential equations and first order on time partial differential equations, we cite the early paper by Hernández et al [11] and the recent interesting works [12][13][14][15][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%