2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.07.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Well-posedness and exponential decay of solutions for the Blackstock–Crighton–Kuznetsov equation

Abstract: Abstract. The present work provides well-posedness and exponential decay results for the Blackstock-Crighton-Kuznetsov equation arising in the modeling of nonlinear acoustic wave propagation in thermally relaxing viscous fluids.First, we treat the associated linear equation by means of operator semigroups. Moreover, we derive energy estimates which we will use in a fixed-point argument in order to obtain well-posedness of the Blackstock-Crighton-Kuznetsov equation. Using a classical barrier argument we prove e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter s ∈ {0, 1} allows us to switch between (1.1) and (1.2). We point out that the present work extends the results from [Bru15] in several ways. First, while in [Bru15] the Blackstock-Crighton equation was considered with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions, we also allow for inhomogeneous Dirichlet as well as Neumann boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The parameter s ∈ {0, 1} allows us to switch between (1.1) and (1.2). We point out that the present work extends the results from [Bru15] in several ways. First, while in [Bru15] the Blackstock-Crighton equation was considered with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions, we also allow for inhomogeneous Dirichlet as well as Neumann boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, in (1.4) we consider potential diffusivity as in (1.3). Therewith, we arrive at equation (1.1) for which in [Bru15] the name Blackstock-Crighton-Kuznetsov equation has been introduced. For a more rigorous derivation of (1.1) we refer to Section 2 in [Bru15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where we have used the same notation k := 1 c 2 (1 − s) + B 2A and s ∈ {0, 1} as in [2]. The corresponding Neumann problem reads…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%