2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02679-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Welfare States and the Health Impact of Social Capital: Focusing on the Crowding-Out and Crowding-In Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is found that the restraining effect of the income gap formation is on households with a low social capital. This conclusion is consistent with that of Karhina et al and Akaeda [55,56]. The possible reason is that the income gap between residents will erode social capital to a certain extent.…”
Section: Discussion On the Impact Of Income Gap On Healthsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is found that the restraining effect of the income gap formation is on households with a low social capital. This conclusion is consistent with that of Karhina et al and Akaeda [55,56]. The possible reason is that the income gap between residents will erode social capital to a certain extent.…”
Section: Discussion On the Impact Of Income Gap On Healthsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…High volunteering rates may indicate a stronger social norm of and recognition for voluntary participation, whereas low rates may make volunteers more needed and their activities more rewarding [22]. Furthermore, "crowding out" the third sector through high social spending may make volunteers feel less needed; alternatively, more voluntary participation of more diverse social groups, which is fostered by high social spending, may lead to more beneficial outcomes of participation [20]. Empirical findings on the roles of these country-level variables in the link between volunteering and SWB or self-rated health remain inconclusive [20,22,23,25,26].…”
Section: Cross-national Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this research yielded inconsistent findings across countries (e.g., Germany vs. the UK), our fourth and final question was, where are more benefits experienced, and why? Prior research has already addressed factors such as country-level volunteering rate, rate of social spending, and level of democracy as potential sources of variation in the link between volunteering or political activism and well-being, but findings remain inconclusive [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In the present article, we formulate and test specific expectations about which country-level variables moderate the associations between which activities (i.e., nonpolitical volunteering vs. political participation) with which outcomes (i.e., dimensions of eudaimonic and social-well-being) and in which age groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former refers to the participation of farmers in social networks, while cognitive social capital primarily refers to mutual trust, reciprocity and mutual assistance among farmers (Krishna & Uphoff, 1999). Some researchers have regarded social capital as a significant positive health factor in various countries (Akaeda, 2021; Ehsan et al, 2019; Fiorillo et al, 2020; Jen et al, 2010; Kawachi et al, 1999; Lin et al, 2019; Veenstra, 2000).…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective wellbeing is considered a dimension of mental health (Jans‐Beken et al, 2018; Keyes, 2005; Westerhof & Keyes, 2010). Literature suggests that farmers’ mental health is affected by household income (Duong & Bradshaw, 2016; Qin et al, 2021; Shields‐Zeeman et al, 2021) and social capital (Akaeda, 2021; Fiorillo et al, 2020; Lin et al, 2019), as well as the farming (agricultural) work environment, including financial instability, isolation and chemical exposure (Fraser et al, 2005; Judd et al, 2006). In addition, supplemental off‐farm employment is also associated with higher levels of mental distress (Logstein, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%