Social Policy Review 15
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1t88xtq.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Welfare reform in the United States:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was no surprise to find, in this study, that education figured prominently in unemployed mothers’ ability to leave welfare employed above the poverty line. Despite the clear precedence of occupational skills in mothers’ eventual outcomes, it was ‘job readiness’ and the job‐search process that were emphasised by ‘Work First’ programmes that followed the 1996 reforms (Holcomb & Martinson, 2002). States should reconsider this emphasis and give occupational training and post‐secondary education the attention which, research indicates, they deserve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was no surprise to find, in this study, that education figured prominently in unemployed mothers’ ability to leave welfare employed above the poverty line. Despite the clear precedence of occupational skills in mothers’ eventual outcomes, it was ‘job readiness’ and the job‐search process that were emphasised by ‘Work First’ programmes that followed the 1996 reforms (Holcomb & Martinson, 2002). States should reconsider this emphasis and give occupational training and post‐secondary education the attention which, research indicates, they deserve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, close examination of the apparent successes of welfare reforms under PRWORA reveals hidden troubles. One such success lies in reports from some states that TANF caseloads dropped off by 30–50 per cent from 1996 to 2000 (Holcomb & Martinson, 2002). On closer examination of these reports, however, economists have attributed up to one‐third of the dramatic reduction, and one‐third of an accompanying rise in TANF participants’ employment rates, to strong economic growth in the 1990s (Kaushal & Kaestner, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted at the outset, some researchers and policymakers have relied on economic indicators, such as recent work experience, to show that the welfare population is not necessarily growing more disadvantaged over time (e.g., Moffitt, 2003). Indeed, data from many local and state systems also suggest that employment indicators have improved over the course of implementing welfare reform (Holcomb and Martinson, 2002; Moffitt, 2003; Zedlewski, 2002; Zedlewski and Alderson, 2001; Zedlewski et al, 2003). The results of this case study suggest, however, that it is possible for employment indicators to improve even as indicators of health impairments and social disadvantages worsen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of site visits to state welfare agencies, the U.S. General Accountability Office found many providers preoccupied by concerns about responding to health-related barriers to work in their caseloads (United States General Accounting Office, 2001; Weil, 2002; Weil and Finegold, 2002). Investigators from the Urban Institute similarly found that welfare systems in 17 cities were shifting more attention to health issues due to concerns about a “growing disconnect between the needs of some recipients and their ‘welfare-to-work program capabilities’” (Holcomb and Martinson, 2002, p2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%