Social Policy Review 15UK and International Perspectives 2003
DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781847424709.003.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Welfare reform in the United States: the first five years of TANF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before briefly discussing the kinds of workfare programmes that have emerged across the USA since 1996, it is important to note that PRWORA effectively abolished the 'right to welfare' as this phrase is commonly understood. Deacon (2001: 1) notes that the original obligation placed upon states 'to pay something to people whose income and resources fell below the limits defined by the federal government' has been removed (see also Holcomb and Martinson, 2003). PRWORA specifically states that the Act 'should not be interpreted to entitle any individual or family to assistance under any state program' (quoted in Deacon, 2001: 1-2).…”
Section: The Usamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before briefly discussing the kinds of workfare programmes that have emerged across the USA since 1996, it is important to note that PRWORA effectively abolished the 'right to welfare' as this phrase is commonly understood. Deacon (2001: 1) notes that the original obligation placed upon states 'to pay something to people whose income and resources fell below the limits defined by the federal government' has been removed (see also Holcomb and Martinson, 2003). PRWORA specifically states that the Act 'should not be interpreted to entitle any individual or family to assistance under any state program' (quoted in Deacon, 2001: 1-2).…”
Section: The Usamentioning
confidence: 99%