2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0826-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Welfare Participation and Time Use in China

Abstract: Using the newly available China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2010 survey data and a propensity score matching method with tobit regressions, this study examines the possible influence of participation in China's primary welfare program, Dibao, on household head's time use pattern in both urban and rural areas. We find that Dibao lowered recipients time spent on various leisure and social activities and increased their idle time for both urban and rural residents. Urban Dibao recipients also tended to spend less… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Neimenggu, Xinjiang, Xizang, Hainan, Ningxia, and Qinghai province are not included in the survey objects of the CFPS.) CFPS has been widely applied in academic studies in both science and social science fields [43][44][45][46][47][48], which confirm the reliability of this survey database.…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Cfpssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…(Neimenggu, Xinjiang, Xizang, Hainan, Ningxia, and Qinghai province are not included in the survey objects of the CFPS.) CFPS has been widely applied in academic studies in both science and social science fields [43][44][45][46][47][48], which confirm the reliability of this survey database.…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Cfpssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Designed by an interdisciplinary group of scholars, the survey collected a sample representative of the national population. The survey covers 1% of the nation's total population, selected by a stratified multi-stageclustering sampling method from the Population Census, with the strata set at the provincial level and the ultimate sampling unit set at the residential community level (Gao, Wu & Zhai 2014;Li & Wu 2014)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the current income effect, however, researchers disagree on how the program affects household welfare more broadly. Gao, Wu, and Zhai (2015) claim that Rural Dibao has a negative impact on household welfare by showing that Rural Dibao participation leads to less time spent on work, leisure, and social activities and more time spent on being idle, resulting in reduced household welfare. Han, Gao, and Xu (2016) support this argument by showing that participation leads to less expenditure on social activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies, for example, Golan et al (2017) and Westmore (2018), the authors have panel data but do not exploit the over-time characteristics of their samples to identify causality. The only three papers that claim to address the endogeneity problems that exist in studying the program's impacts on welfare all rely on propensity score matching with their cross-sectional data (Gao et al, 2015;Han et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation