Welfare and social protection: What is the link with secondary migration? Evidence from the 2014‐crisis hit Italian region of Lombardy

Abstract

Evidence on the relationship between secondary international migration and welfare state (or formal protection) support is currently limited. Also, the experience of financial support from semiformal and informal social protection networks has seen limited inclusion in current reflections on secondary mobility patterns such as onward and return migration. Our study analyses the relationship between support from formal, informal and semiformal social protection and short-term secondary migration intentions. The study uses open-access data from the Regional Observatory for Integration and Multiethnicity of Lombardy (Italy) and adopts a competing-risk framework through multinomial logistic regression. Our data do not support the hypothesis of an ex-post "magnetic effect" of the Italian formal social protection on its beneficiaries: individuals on formal welfare are more prone to onward and return migration. However, the positive relationship observed between welfare entitlements and onward migration intentions cannot rule out any effect of welfare magnetism from more generous welfare systems. Monetary aid received from Italian friends is negatively related to return intention. At the same time, economic support from foreignborn friends is correlated to return migration. We interpret results according to social network theory. Economic support and social capital from bridging networks can act as an ex-post integration-driven magnet. Bonding social capital from ties with migrants in Italy cannot secure the migrants' stay in Italy. However, it can support return migration. Networks providing bonding transnational social capital, and expressed in the form of financial support from relatives living abroad, are instead positively correlated to both forms of secondary migration.

COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Challenges in the Construction Sector: A Case Study of Slovak Enterprises

“…However, Jha [84] pointed to the fact that the direct cash benefits provided during the pandemic to construction sector employees were of significant help as they helped them to overcome financial hardship more easily. Unfortunately, this support was primarily associated not only with the dysfunctionality of the institutions in the handling process but with several financial problems [85]. Such aid was introduced in Slovakia in the form of First Aid I and First Aid II, which offered a large number of self-employed people in the construction sector to draw benefits calculated on the basis of the decrease in their cash income during the pandemic compared to the amount of their income in the period before the pandemic.…”

Transregional spouses, parents and children: How gender and family shape return migration in the French overseas

“…To capture effective links maintained with the DOM, we add two dummy variables indicating if the migrant sends or receives money in or from the DOM. Indeed, financial support received from migrants is an important manifestation of bonding social capital (Ortensi & Barbiano di Belgiojoso, 2022). Besides, remittances can ensure informal social protection to relatives at origin, and, the other way around, migrants overseas can also be the receivers of ‘reverse remittances’ (Mazzucato, 2011) and financial and social support from those left behind (Palash & Baby‐Collin, 2019; Serra Mingot & Mazzucato, 2017).…”