2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2009.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Welfare and growth impacts of innovation policies in a small, open economy; an applied general equilibrium analysis

Abstract: Welfare and growth impacts of innovation policies in a small, open economyAn applied general equilibrium analysis Abstract:We explore how innovation incentives in a small, open economy should be designed in order to achieve the highest welfare and growth, by means of a computable general equilibrium model with R&D-driven endogenous technological change embodied in varieties of capital. We study policy alternatives targeted towards R&D, capital varieties formation, and domestic investments in capital varieties.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model presented in this paper is an extension of that of Bye et al (2007) in three dimensions. Firstly, GHG emissions are included.…”
Section: General Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model presented in this paper is an extension of that of Bye et al (2007) in three dimensions. Firstly, GHG emissions are included.…”
Section: General Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each patent represents a fixed entry cost for a capital variety firm, and gives that firm a monopoly on the production of a separate capital variety. Due to love of capital variety, the productivity of variety capital within final goods industries increases with the number of capital variety firms.The model presented in this paper is an extension of that of Bye et al (2007) in three dimensions. Firstly, GHG emissions are included.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher or lower values of these identical parameters will not change our conclusions. Earlier analyses confirm that the positive welfare effect of an R&D subsidy increases with the value of the spillover parameter and the mark-up factor in the markets for capital varieties, Bye et al (2009) and Heggedal and Jacobsen (2008).…”
Section: Directed Randd Supportmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Intertemporal equilibrium requires fulfilment of two transversality conditions: the limit values of the total discounted values of net foreign debt and real capital must both be zero. The relative effects of the different policy analyses are independent of this assumption (see also Bye et al, 2009). …”
Section: B5 Consumer Behaviour and Balanced Growth Pathmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Based on the comparative OECD data, reports by Science, Technology and Innovation Council 2 emphasize, for instance, that the Canadian economy has been in a "low ranking" position in terms of performance in R&D in general; but especially reveals "low ranking" status in areas such as industry/business expenditure on R&D, percentage of total R&D 1 Applied work analyzing alternative growth promoting policies either through R&D or education based endogenous growth models within advanced country settings also include Diao et al (1999), Bye et al (2009) and Mattalia (2012).…”
Section: Growth With Respect To Randd and Human Capital Accumulation Inmentioning
confidence: 99%