2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-10567-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weld fatigue behavior of gas metal arc welded steel sheets based on porosity and gap size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not as critical as cracks, porosity should be minimized. NDT techniques can detect porosity, but their sensitivity varies [ 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not as critical as cracks, porosity should be minimized. NDT techniques can detect porosity, but their sensitivity varies [ 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weld quality directly impacts the integrity, durability, and safety of the fabricated components. Traditional methods to assess the quality of weld joints involve destructive testing, such as confirming weld shape [1][2][3][4] and evaluating mechanical properties through tensile testing [4][5][6] and fatigue testing [7][8][9][10]. However, these methods only facilitate a partial inspection of the weld joints and indirectly represent the welding quality of the overall structure [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%