Abstract:This study focuses on the frames utilized in the depiction of Syrian refugees and social and political actors involved in the Syrian resettlement in Canadian online news media. The role of the media is vital in portraying Syrian refugees' image and affects how the Canadian public perceives them. This paper focuses on utilizing the referential and predicational strategies introduced by the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) in framing the Syrian refugees, Liberal government, Conservative party, Canadians, and … Show more
“…The refugees are reported as committing domestic violence and sexual assault (Malcolm, 2017). While both of these crimes are serious and require corrective actions, the overt framing bias of the author who uses hyperbolic and sensationalist phrases to generalize isolated events contributes to reinforcing the long-established image of refugees as culturally unadaptable and helps shape the perception of domestic violence and sexual assault as foreign constructs in Canada (Mustafa and Pilus, 2020):…”
This paper examines the representation of Syrian refugees in the Canadian press, from December 2015 to December 2017, in four English-language major newspapers. Using methods of Corpus Linguistics (CL) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this study found three prominent themes, namely intake, integration, and concern, through which Syrian refugees are depicted across the political spectrum. The results indicate that adopting a more inclusive immigration policy did not totally negate the biased and discriminatory representations entrenched in the media coverage of refugees, but it can set the stage for more empowering and sympathetic treatment of refugees in the media. This analysis speaks to the importance of media discourse in producing and maintaining particular depictions of refugees among the Canadian public, highlighting the role of ideological and political stances in the portrayals of refugees across news outlets.
“…The refugees are reported as committing domestic violence and sexual assault (Malcolm, 2017). While both of these crimes are serious and require corrective actions, the overt framing bias of the author who uses hyperbolic and sensationalist phrases to generalize isolated events contributes to reinforcing the long-established image of refugees as culturally unadaptable and helps shape the perception of domestic violence and sexual assault as foreign constructs in Canada (Mustafa and Pilus, 2020):…”
This paper examines the representation of Syrian refugees in the Canadian press, from December 2015 to December 2017, in four English-language major newspapers. Using methods of Corpus Linguistics (CL) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this study found three prominent themes, namely intake, integration, and concern, through which Syrian refugees are depicted across the political spectrum. The results indicate that adopting a more inclusive immigration policy did not totally negate the biased and discriminatory representations entrenched in the media coverage of refugees, but it can set the stage for more empowering and sympathetic treatment of refugees in the media. This analysis speaks to the importance of media discourse in producing and maintaining particular depictions of refugees among the Canadian public, highlighting the role of ideological and political stances in the portrayals of refugees across news outlets.
“…The context turns out to be political in its linguistic construct by selecting, emphasizing, and elaborating certain facts while excluding others. For example, Mustafa and Pilus (2020) has shown that National Canadian online news sites have employed the linguistic devices of deixis, metaphor, lexical choices and naming to define the Refugee Resettlement Initiative of the Canadian Govt. both as a success and a failure.…”
Section: Political Discourse Of Covid-19: a Spin Of Convictionmentioning
Covid-19 has flared a match of accusation between U.S. and China. Both of the nations have alleged each other for the origin of the virus and the incompetence to contain it within the respective national boundary. The allegations have emerged at a critical period when the virus has infected the entire global population. The study identifies a political discourse, that is, 'Lab origin theory' out of these allegations and investigate the form, structure, and pattern of language in use following the methodology of Critical Discourse Analysis. The article contends that these allegations are based not on facts but on conviction, opinions, and beliefs which are expressed in the 'spin' or turn of retaliatory responses. Forming a series of exchanges these allegations promote certain truth-claims which are, in fact, subjective interpretations and hypothetical assumptions of the origin of Covid-19. The claims of 'Lab origin' are established with certain linguistic strategies and symbolic models, and their nature can be only understood with the phenomenon of Post-truth. The concept of Post-truth has been developed against the backdrop of controversial as well as political events of Brexit vote and the U.S. presidential election in 2016. Like these events, Covid-19 is an occasion of Post-truth and its Lab origin theory is a compromise between fact and belief.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.