2015 IEEE 6th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/camsap.2015.7383837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weiss-Weinstein bound for change-point estimation

Abstract: We compute the Weiss-Weinstein bound in the context of change-point estimation in a multivariate time series whatever the considered distribution of the data as well the prior. Closed-form expressions are then given in the case of Gaussian observations with change of mean and variance and in the case of parameter change in a Poisson distribution. The proposed bound is shown to be tighter than the previous bounds which were originally derived in the deterministic context and provides a better approximation of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Weiss-Weinstein bound (WWB) is known to be one of the tightest Bayesian bounds, and for this reason, its derivation would be of great interest for change-point estimation. We recently derived it for a single change-point [21], and the aim of this paper is to generalize this study to the context of multiple changes. Note that even if the WWB is a Bayesian bound, it can still be used to assess the performance of the MLE in terms of global MSE, see e.g., [22]- [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Weiss-Weinstein bound (WWB) is known to be one of the tightest Bayesian bounds, and for this reason, its derivation would be of great interest for change-point estimation. We recently derived it for a single change-point [21], and the aim of this paper is to generalize this study to the context of multiple changes. Note that even if the WWB is a Bayesian bound, it can still be used to assess the performance of the MLE in terms of global MSE, see e.g., [22]- [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conclude, equations (17), (19), (20), (24), (25), (32), (33) and (34) provide all the expressions necessary to determine the elements of the matrix W (H, s) CV −1 C T in (16). It is worth noticing that, due to the structure of the matrices V 11 , V 12 and V 22 , the inversion of V should not be particularly difficult from a computational point of view.…”
Section: ) Block V 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We finally obtain the HB for a Poisson distributed signal that includes Q change-points by plugging these last expressions into the equations (17), (19), (20), (24), (25), (32), (33) and (34) from Section IV-A, and by applying the procedure described in Section III-C, which leads to the tightest bound.…”
Section: B Gaussian and Poisson Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Chapman-Robbins bound has been derived in [14] in the context of one change point and extended to the multiple change point problem in [15]. In the Bayesian context, the Weiss-Weinstein bound has been studied in [16]- [18]. In this paper, we stay in the non-Bayesian context to study the Barankin (or McAulay-Seidman bound) [19], [20] for a change point estimation problem when (contrary to previous works) two sets of non synchronized data are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%