2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted strategies to guide a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for multi-UAV mission planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Refs. [ 37 , 38 , 39 ] present different GA-based planner for scheduling the observation tasks of different satellites, while [ 23 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ] use multiple-objective evolutionary algorithms to solve task planning problems for multiple UAVs engaged in performing monitoring tasks in dissected areas of interest. Although our planner also uses a GA algorithm to determine the best solution plans for a given scenario, it solves a different type of monitoring task mission problem, involving exogenous time-varying events (i.e., weather) and time-dependent mission requirements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Refs. [ 37 , 38 , 39 ] present different GA-based planner for scheduling the observation tasks of different satellites, while [ 23 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ] use multiple-objective evolutionary algorithms to solve task planning problems for multiple UAVs engaged in performing monitoring tasks in dissected areas of interest. Although our planner also uses a GA algorithm to determine the best solution plans for a given scenario, it solves a different type of monitoring task mission problem, involving exogenous time-varying events (i.e., weather) and time-dependent mission requirements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These constraints include temporal constraints implying the start and end times of tasks, path constraints assuring that vehicles avoid NFZs in their paths, coverage constraints assuring that the UAV is inside the range of the GCS controlling it, LOS is maintained, etc. More information about this problem is presented in [ 5 ].…”
Section: Automated Mission Planner and Dssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, UAVs are controlled remotely by human operators using rudimentary planning systems, such as pre-configured plans, classical planners that are not able to cope with the entire complexity of the problem or manually provided schedules. Some recent works [ 4 , 5 ] have provided more efficient approaches to solve the Multi-UAV Cooperative Mission Planning Problem (MCMPP) considering several features of the problem such as time constraints, fuel constraints, sensor constraints, etc. Due to its complexity and multiple conflicting criteria (e.g., makespan, cost or risk of the mission), multi-objective solvers such as Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEAs) have been used in these works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to military applications and usually assumes a cooperative swarm of UAVs collaborating for the mission achievement. The decision model might be Markov Decision Process oriented [11] or multi-objective evolutionary algorithms based [12,13]. UAV health oriented approaches will tend to avoid physical damage or loss of the drone.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%