2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10260-021-00590-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted stochastic block model

Abstract: We propose a weighted stochastic block model (WSBM) which extends the stochastic block model to the important case in which edges are weighted. We address the parameter estimation of the WSBM by use of maximum likelihood and variational approaches, and establish the consistency of these estimators. The problem of choosing the number of classes in a WSBM is addressed. The proposed model is applied to simulated data and an illustrative data set.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we view the knowledge derived from sparse light microscopy collected from multiple brains valuable in its own merit, as it provides complementary information on the shared circuit elements across individuals (Ascoli 2015). In this regard, it is useful to note that our probabilistic model, currently restricted to Bernoulli adjacency matrices, can be generalized to cluster non-binary connectomes using a weighted SBM (Aicher, Jacobs, & Clauset 2015; Ng & Murphy 2021), which would allow accounting for the number of synapses between connected neuron pairs (Tecuatl, Wheeler, & Ascoli 2021) in the identification of connectivity-based classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we view the knowledge derived from sparse light microscopy collected from multiple brains valuable in its own merit, as it provides complementary information on the shared circuit elements across individuals (Ascoli 2015). In this regard, it is useful to note that our probabilistic model, currently restricted to Bernoulli adjacency matrices, can be generalized to cluster non-binary connectomes using a weighted SBM (Aicher, Jacobs, & Clauset 2015; Ng & Murphy 2021), which would allow accounting for the number of synapses between connected neuron pairs (Tecuatl, Wheeler, & Ascoli 2021) in the identification of connectivity-based classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, in this paper, we estimate the number of communities for weighted networks generated from DCDFM by Equation ( 3 ) when we choose the method as the spectral method nDFA. If we let be algorithms developed in [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ] to fit their weighted stochastic blockmodels for weighted networks, we wonder that we can also estimate K for these models through Equation ( 3 ). We leave them for the future.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant drawback of the above SBM-based and DCSBM-based methods is that they ignore the impact of edge weights which are common in network data and could help us to understand the community structure of a network better [ 16 ]. Recently, community detection in weighted networks has become a hot topic and many statistical models have been developed to fit weighted networks, such as the weighted stochastic blockmodels (WSBM) proposed in [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ], the distribution-free model (DFM) of [ 55 ], and the degree-corrected distribution-free model (DCDFM) introduced in [ 56 ]. Among these models, DFM and its extension DCDFM stand out as they allow edge weights to follow any distribution as long as the expected adjacency matrix follows a block structure related to community partition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An argument can also be made to use stochastic block models for weighted food webs. While such approaches exist for weighted networks (Aicher et al 2015;Ng and Murphy 2021), it is also important to consider that this could introduce further stochasticity in the data, for example, fluctuating populations and biomass.…”
Section: Paper I-iiimentioning
confidence: 99%