2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11050518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted Spatial Pyramid Matching Collaborative Representation for Remote-Sensing-Image Scene Classification

Abstract: At present, nonparametric subspace classifiers, such as collaborative representation-based classification (CRC) and sparse representation-based classification (SRC), are widely used in many pattern-classification and -recognition tasks. Meanwhile, the spatial pyramid matching (SPM) scheme, which considers spatial information in representing the image, is efficient for image classification. However, for SPM, the weights to evaluate the representation of different subregions are fixed. In this paper, we first in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drawbacks of handcrafted features can be overcome by unsupervised learning-based features that have been studied by many researchers [30][31][32]. The input of unsupervised learning-based features is some handcrafted features, while the statistics of handcrafted features are output.…”
Section: R E T R a C T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawbacks of handcrafted features can be overcome by unsupervised learning-based features that have been studied by many researchers [30][31][32]. The input of unsupervised learning-based features is some handcrafted features, while the statistics of handcrafted features are output.…”
Section: R E T R a C T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22], three kinds of pre-trained CNN models were employed as feature extractors, and the features from the first fully connected layer were used for classification. In [44,46,[51][52][53]71], deep features from pre-trained CNNs were reprocessed to achieved excellent performance. In [73], a deep-learning-based classification method was presented to improve classification performance by combining pre-trained CNNs and extreme learning machine (ELM).…”
Section: Comparisons With the Most Recent Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published Time Classification Accuracy (%) MS-CLBP+FV [70] 2017 86.48 ± 0.27 GoogLeNet [22] 2017 86.39 ± 0.55 VGG-VD-16 [22] 2017 89.64 ± 0.36 CaffeNet [22] 2017 89.53 ± 0.31 DCA with concatenation [55] 2017 89.71 ± 0.33 Fusion by concatenation [55] 2017 91.86 ± 0.28 Fusion by addition [55] 2017 91.87 ± 0.36 Bidirectional adaptive feature fusion [72] 2017 93.56 salM 3 LBP-CLM [74] 2017 89.76 ± 0.45 TEX-Net-LF [56] 2017 92.96 ± 0.18 Converted CaffeNet [78] 2018 92.17 ± 0.31 Two-stage deep feature fusion [78] 2018 94.65 ± 0.33 Multilevel fusion [79] 2018 94.17 ± 0.32 ARCNet-VGG16 [4] 2019 93.10 ± 0.55 VGG19 + Hybrid-KCRC (RBF) [52] 2018 91.82 VGG-16-CapsNet [43] 2019 94.74 ± 0.17 VGG19 + SPM-CRC [51] 2019 92.55 VGG19 + WSPM-CRC [51] 2019 92.57 CTFCNN Ours 94.91 ± 0.24…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the pixel values from 0 to 255 in R, G, and B are normalized to generate a value from 0 to 1. The formula is shown in (3).…”
Section: A Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the development of remote sensing technology, this technology has been applied to various fields, such as image identification [1], [2], [36], scene classification [3]- [5], and semantic segmentation [6]- [8]. Research on marine remote sensing has become increasingly important [9]- [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%