2007
DOI: 10.1109/tnn.2006.885038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted Piecewise LDA for Solving the Small Sample Size Problem in Face Verification

Abstract: A novel algorithm that can be used to boost the performance of face-verification methods that utilize Fisher's criterion is presented and evaluated. The algorithm is applied to similarity, or matching error, data and provides a general solution for overcoming the "small sample size" (SSS) problem, where the lack of sufficient training samples causes improper estimation of a linear separation hyperplane between the classes. Two independent phases constitute the proposed method. Initially, a set of weighted piec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For overcoming the small sample size problem, regularization techniques have also been employed [11], [12]. Moreover, in an indirect way to deal with the singularity problem, another method (2D-LDA), where the data are represented as matrices has been proposed in [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For overcoming the small sample size problem, regularization techniques have also been employed [11], [12]. Moreover, in an indirect way to deal with the singularity problem, another method (2D-LDA), where the data are represented as matrices has been proposed in [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact has also been demonstrated in the evaluation results that processed the ORL and XM2VTS data. This malady is justified by the fact that the SSS problem is very severe since the lack of sufficient training samples causes improper estimation of a linear separation hyperplane between the classes, thus discriminant analysis cannot be modelled properly [45]. In order to make salient comparisons with other relevant methods, we chose to implement, to the best of our understanding, the related state-of-the-art HDA algorithm in Ref.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Performance With Respect To Available Number Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised feature extraction [28] methods use the labels of the data to find the most discriminatory features. The best known supervised method is Fisher linear discriminant analysis (FLD), which maximizes the separability measure (1) The between-class scatter and the within-class matrices are defined as (2) (3) where is the class-conditional covariance matrix for the class , is the class-conditional sample mean, and is the global sample mean.…”
Section: A Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%