2013
DOI: 10.1214/12-aos1073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted likelihood estimation under two-phase sampling

Abstract: We develop asymptotic theory for weighted likelihood estimators (WLE) under two-phase stratified sampling without replacement. We also consider several variants of WLEs involving estimated weights and calibration. A set of empirical process tools are developed including a Glivenko–Cantelli theorem, a theorem for rates of convergence of M-estimators, and a Donsker theorem for the inverse probability weighted empirical processes under two-phase sampling and sampling without replacement at the second phase. Using… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
119
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A discrete stratification variable based on the phase one data is specified (which usually includes case status such that the sampling is outcome-dependent), and within each stratum subjects are selected into phase two. Some authors have restricted the term “two-phase sampling” to without replacement stratified sampling (Breslow et al, 2009a, 2009b, Saegusa and Wellner, 2013), whereas others have broadened the definition to include either Bernoulli sampling or without replacement sampling (Breslow and Lumley, 2013); here we adopt the broader definition. Most theoretical results for two-phase sampling methods have assumed Bernoulli sampling, which facilitates easier proofs of asymptotic properties because the sampling indicators are iid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A discrete stratification variable based on the phase one data is specified (which usually includes case status such that the sampling is outcome-dependent), and within each stratum subjects are selected into phase two. Some authors have restricted the term “two-phase sampling” to without replacement stratified sampling (Breslow et al, 2009a, 2009b, Saegusa and Wellner, 2013), whereas others have broadened the definition to include either Bernoulli sampling or without replacement sampling (Breslow and Lumley, 2013); here we adopt the broader definition. Most theoretical results for two-phase sampling methods have assumed Bernoulli sampling, which facilitates easier proofs of asymptotic properties because the sampling indicators are iid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most theoretical results for two-phase sampling methods have assumed Bernoulli sampling, which facilitates easier proofs of asymptotic properties because the sampling indicators are iid. Saegusa and Wellner (2013) is an exception that tackled the challenge of dependent sampling indicators in proving theoretical results under two-phase stratified without replacement sampling. In this paper we develop the results under Bernoulli two-phase sampling, which matches the sampling design of the real data application described below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, under our design, the subcohort is a simple random sample of the cohort selected by independent Bernoulli sampling. When the subcohort is selected by sampling without replacement, our method should work, though more complicated arguments would be needed to develop the asymptotic results (Saegusa & Wellner, 2013). Moreover, when some covariates are available for all cohort members, a stratified case-cohort design based on those covariates could be considered to improve the study efficiency and adapting our method to such design should be straightforward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence calibration to stratum frequencies enables one to reconcile the apparent difference between the two sampling schemes. Further calibration would in principle improve the efficiency of estimation under either scheme (Saegusa and Wellner 2013). …”
Section: Inverse Probability Weighted Z-estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%