1997
DOI: 10.1155/s1025583497000076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted Lagrange and Hermite–Fejér interpolation on the real line

Abstract: For a wide class of weights, a systematic investigation of the convergence-divergence behavior of Lagrange interpolation is initiated. A system of nodes with optimal Lebesgue constant is found, and for Hermite weights an exact lower estimate of the norm of projection operators is given. In the same spirit, the case of Hermite-Fej6r interpolation is also considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…hold uniformly with respect to m and k. The previous relations can be easily deduced from [17] and [39]. The following lemma is new and will be useful in the sequel.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…hold uniformly with respect to m and k. The previous relations can be easily deduced from [17] and [39]. The following lemma is new and will be useful in the sequel.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…holds, where C is a positive constant independent of m and f. Theorem 2.2 is a simple but useful modification of a previous result by J. Szabados [39]. In Section 4 we will give the proof of this theorem not only for completeness, but also because we can deduce a slightly more general estimate.…”
Section: Lagrange Interpolation Let Us Denote Bymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to obtain these kinds of projectors, following an idea previously used in [33,10], we denote by L m+2 (w, f ) the Lagrange polynomial interpolating f ∈ L , but onto a subspace P m+1 ⊂ P m+1 . We prove that m P m+1 is dense in L p u , for 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, and that for each element of P m+1 , both Marcinkiewicz inequalities hold true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%